Literature DB >> 15547053

Assessing psychosocial/quality of life outcomes in screening: how do we do it better?

Kirsten J McCaffery, Alexandra L Barratt.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15547053      PMCID： PMC1732634          DOI： 10.1136/jech.2004.025114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN： 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

Review 1.  The psychological harms of screening: the evidence we have versus the evidence we need.

Authors:  Jessica T DeFrank; Colleen Barclay; Stacey Sheridan; Noel T Brewer; Meredith Gilliam; Andrew M Moon; William Rearick; Carolyn Ziemer; Russell Harris
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Long-term effect of population screening for diabetes on cardiovascular morbidity, self-rated health, and health behavior.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Rebecca K Simmons; A Toby Prevost; Kate M Williams; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Measuring the psychosocial consequences of screening.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Stephen P McKenna; Lynda C Doward; Hanne Thorsen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 3.186

4.  Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Benedicte Kirkøen; Paula Berstad; Edoardo Botteri; Tone Lise Åvitsland; Alvilde Maria Ossum; Thomas de Lange; Geir Hoff; Tomm Bernklev
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Consequences of screening in abdominal aortic aneurysm: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.

Authors:  John Brodersen; Anders Hansson; Minna Johansson; Volkert Siersma; Marcus Langenskiöld; Monica Pettersson
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-04

6.  Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study.

Authors:  Jakob Fraes Rasmussen; Volkert Siersma; Jessica Malmqvist; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Consequences of screening in colorectal cancer (COS-CRC): development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.

Authors:  Jessica Malmqvist; Volkert Siersma; Christine Winther Bang; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Did psychosocial status, sociodemographics and smoking status affect non-attendance in control participants in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial? A nested observational study.

Authors:  Jessica Malmqvist; Volkert Siersma; Hanne Thorsen; Bruno Heleno; Jakob Fraes Rasmussen; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The clinical utility of a comprehensive psychosomatic assessment in the program for colorectal cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sara Gostoli; Maria Montecchiarini; Alessia Urgese; Francesco Ferrara; Anna Maria Polifemo; Liza Ceroni; Asia Gasparri; Chiara Rafanelli; Vincenzo Cennamo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jessica Malmqvist; Volkert Dirk Siersma; Mie Sara Hestbech; Christine Winther Bang; Dagný Rós Nicolaisdóttir; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2021-06-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.