Literature DB >> 15546963

A comparison of the semiflexed (MTP) view with the standing extended view (SEV) in the radiographic assessment of knee osteoarthritis in a busy routine X-ray department.

J Duddy1, J R Kirwan, B Szebenyi, S Clarke, R Granell, S Volkov.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the reproducibility of the standing extended view (SEV) (also known as the standing anteroposterior view) with the semiflexed, postero-anterior view [the 'metatarsophalangeal' (MTP)] view for assessing joint space width (JSW) and osteophytes in osteoarthritis of the knee when used in a busy routine X-ray department.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients (24 men) had both SEV and MTP views taken on the same day in a busy National Health Service radiography department. Repeat views were taken as entirely separate procedures some time over the following 2 weeks, in the same department and with no special arrangements for the selection of radiographers, time of day, or X-ray machine. The first 24 patients had second views in the SEV position whilst the remaining 23 had second MTP views. Radiographs were read independently by two experienced observers who measured JSW with a transparent ruler to the nearest 0.5 mm at the narrowest point in both medial and lateral compartments of the tibiofemoral joint in both knees. Osteophytes were graded 0-2 according to a standard atlas. Ten SEV and 10 MTP radiographs selected randomly were re-read by one observer.
RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval) JSW in the medial compartment measured on SEV radiographs was 3.54 mm (3.08, 3.99) and on MTP radiographs it was 2.80 mm (2.37, 3.23); in the lateral compartment it was 6.04 mm (5.71, 6.37) when measured on SEV radiographs and 5.47 mm (5.09, 5.85) on MTP radiographs. The estimated variances for the medial compartment were 2.0 mm2 for SEV and 0.2 mm2 for MTP (P < 0.001) and for the lateral compartment 1.4 mm2 for SEV and 0.5 mm2 for MTP (P < 0.001). The proportion of radiographs for which there was disagreement between observers regarding osteophyte grade was not statistically different between SEV and MTP views (SEV, medial 40%, lateral 44%; MTP, medial 39%, lateral 39%).
CONCLUSIONS: Even when radiographs are taken in a busy National Health Service radiography department, measurement of JSW from the MTP view is more reproducible than from the SEV view, the MTP view gives a slightly lower measurement of JSW, and there is no advantage in using either view in recording osteophyte grade. We recommend the wider adoption of the MTP method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15546963     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  11 in total

Review 1.  OARSI-OMERACT definition of relevant radiological progression in hip/knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  P Ornetti; K Brandt; M-P Hellio-Le Graverand; M Hochberg; D J Hunter; M Kloppenburg; N Lane; J-F Maillefert; S A Mazzuca; T Spector; G Utard-Wlerick; E Vignon; M Dougados
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Reproducibility of joint space width and the intermargin distance measurements in patients with medial osteoarthritis of the knee in various degrees of flexion.

Authors:  Toshiaki Takahashi; Norio Yamanaka; Masahiko Ikeuchi; Haruyasu Yamamoto
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Identification of progressors in osteoarthritis by combining biochemical and MRI-based markers.

Authors:  Erik B Dam; Marco Loog; Claus Christiansen; Inger Byrjalsen; Jenny Folkesson; Mads Nielsen; Arish A Qazi; Paola C Pettersen; Patrick Garnero; Morten A Karsdal
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  The standing fixed flexion view detects narrowing of the joint space better than the standing extended view in patients with moderate osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  Tuukka Niinimäki; Risto Ojala; Jaakko Niinimäki; Juhana Leppilahti
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  The high prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in a rural Chinese population: the Wuchuan osteoarthritis study.

Authors:  Xiaozheng Kang; Marlene Fransen; Yuqing Zhang; Hu Li; Yan Ke; Ming Lu; Steve Su; Xiongying Song; Yong Guo; Jie Chen; Jingbo Niu; David Felson; Jianhao Lin
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-05-15

6.  Marked disability and high use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs associated with knee osteoarthritis in rural China: a cross-sectional population-based survey.

Authors:  Jianhao Lin; Marlene Fransen; Xiaozheng Kang; Hu Li; Yan Ke; Zhiqiang Wang; Yuqing Zhang; Steve Su
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Flexion Posteroanterior Radiographs Affect Both Enrollment for and Outcomes After Injection Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Maximilian A Meyer; Timothy S Leroux; David M Levy; Annemarie K Tilton; Paul B Lewis; Adam B Yanke; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-22

8.  The effect of vitamin D supplementation on knee osteoarthritis, the VIDEO study: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  N K Arden; S Cro; S Sheard; C J Doré; A Bara; S A Tebbs; D J Hunter; S James; C Cooper; T W O'Neill; A Macgregor; F Birrell; R Keen
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Prevalence and associated factors of knee osteoarthritis in a rural Chinese adult population: an epidemiological survey.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Haifeng Zhang; Ningxia Liang; Weimin Fan; Jun Li; Zuhu Huang; Zhijian Yin; Zhijun Wu; Jun Hu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Fixed-flexion view X-ray of the knee superior in detection and follow-up of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kan; Yuji Arai; Masashi Kobayashi; Shuji Nakagawa; Hiroaki Inoue; Manabu Hino; Shintaro Komaki; Kazuya Ikoma; Keiichiro Ueshima; Hiroyoshi Fujiwara; Isao Yokota; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.