OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of esophagitis (based on esophageal biopsy results) and aspiration (based on bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]) in children with hoarseness. DESIGN: Retrospective medical chart review spanning 24 months of 127 consecutive children (mean age, 6.9 years; range, 1.8-17 years) who presented with hoarseness to 2 attending otolaryngologists. SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital.Intervention All subjects underwent direct laryngoscopy, rigid bronchoscopy with BAL, and rigid or flexible esophagoscopy with biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BAL result was considered positive if the number of lipid-laden macrophages was "moderate" or "large," and the esophageal biopsy result was considered positive if any 2 of the following 3 histologic criteria were present: basal cell hyperplasia, increased papillary height, and intraepithelial inflammatory infiltrate. Comparisons between subjective endoscopic findings and objective test results were made using the t test and contingency table analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 127 children, 104 (82%) had vocal nodules; 53 (43%) had endoscopically visualized laryngitis; 36 (28%) had tracheobronchial inflammatory changes; 60 (47%) had abnormal esophagoscopy findings; 47 (37%) had a positive BAL result; and 38 (30%) had a positive esophageal biopsy result. There was no significant correlation between BAL and esophageal biopsy results (P = .11). The odds of having positive BAL or esophageal biopsy results were unaffected by the presence of vocal nodules; endoscopically visualized inflammation of the larynx, trachea, or esophagus; or symptoms or previous clinical history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSION: Positive esophageal biopsy and BAL results are prevalent among children with hoarseness, regardless of subjective upper aerodigestive tract endoscopic findings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of esophagitis (based on esophageal biopsy results) and aspiration (based on bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]) in children with hoarseness. DESIGN: Retrospective medical chart review spanning 24 months of 127 consecutive children (mean age, 6.9 years; range, 1.8-17 years) who presented with hoarseness to 2 attending otolaryngologists. SETTING: Tertiary care children's hospital.Intervention All subjects underwent direct laryngoscopy, rigid bronchoscopy with BAL, and rigid or flexible esophagoscopy with biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The BAL result was considered positive if the number of lipid-laden macrophages was "moderate" or "large," and the esophageal biopsy result was considered positive if any 2 of the following 3 histologic criteria were present: basal cell hyperplasia, increased papillary height, and intraepithelial inflammatory infiltrate. Comparisons between subjective endoscopic findings and objective test results were made using the t test and contingency table analysis, where appropriate. RESULTS: Of the 127 children, 104 (82%) had vocal nodules; 53 (43%) had endoscopically visualized laryngitis; 36 (28%) had tracheobronchial inflammatory changes; 60 (47%) had abnormal esophagoscopy findings; 47 (37%) had a positive BAL result; and 38 (30%) had a positive esophageal biopsy result. There was no significant correlation between BAL and esophageal biopsy results (P = .11). The odds of having positive BAL or esophageal biopsy results were unaffected by the presence of vocal nodules; endoscopically visualized inflammation of the larynx, trachea, or esophagus; or symptoms or previous clinical history of gastroesophageal reflux disease. CONCLUSION: Positive esophageal biopsy and BAL results are prevalent among children with hoarseness, regardless of subjective upper aerodigestive tract endoscopic findings.