Literature DB >> 15543452

Multidimensional visual field maps: relationships among local psychophysical and local electrophysiological measures.

William Seiple1, Karen Holopigian, Janet P Szlyk, Carolyn Wu.   

Abstract

Multidimensional psychophysical and electrophysical maps of the central retina are essential for assessing the functioning of the diseased retina. In this study, grating acuity, contrast sensitivity, duration for letter identification, multifocal electroretinograms, and Humphrey visual field thresholds were measured at equivalent positions throughout the central 20 degrees. We found that the rates of sensitivity loss were not equivalent for all psychophysical measures. The rate of loss in the duration required for letter identification as a function of eccentricity was the steepest, followed by acuity and contrast sensitivity. The rate of loss in luminance sensitivity as measured in the Humphrey visual field was the shallowest. The pattern of losses also varied across meridians. Specifically, the rate of loss as a function of eccentricity was highest in the vertical meridian and lowest in the horizontal meridian. These maps and the correlations among measures as a function of retinal position serve as a baseline so that we can examine disease effects throughout the retina. In addition, the development of vision rehabilitation programs focused on eccentric viewing training should consider the differential sensitivities of the peripheral retina.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543452     DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.07.0111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  5 in total

1.  Isoeccentric locations are not equivalent: the extent of the vertical meridian asymmetry.

Authors:  Jared Abrams; Aaron Nizam; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Delayed saccade to perceptually demanding locations in Parkinson's disease: analysis from the perspective of the speed-accuracy trade-off.

Authors:  Makoto Kobayashi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Modeling visual performance differences 'around' the visual field: A computational observer approach.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Asymmetries around the visual field: From retina to cortex to behavior.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Noah C Benson; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations.

Authors:  Marnix Naber; George A Alvarez; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.