Literature DB >> 15543228

Intervention centred on adolescents' physical activity and sedentary behaviour (ICAPS): concept and 6-month results.

C Simon1, A Wagner, C DiVita, E Rauscher, C Klein-Platat, D Arveiler, B Schweitzer, E Triby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-month impact of a physical activity (PA) multilevel intervention on activity patterns and psychological predictors of PA among adolescents. The intervention was directed at changing knowledge and attitudes and at providing social support and environmental conditions that encourage PA of adolescents inside and outside school. SUBJECTS AND
DESIGN: Randomised, controlled ongoing field trial (ICAPS) in middle-school's first-level adolescents from eight schools selected in the department of the Bas-Rhin (Eastern France) with a cohort of 954 adolescents (92% of the eligible students) initially aged 11.7+/-0.6 y. The 6-month changes in participation in leisure organised PA (LOPA), high sedentary (SED) behaviour (>3 h/day), self-efficacy (SELF) and intention (INTENT) towards PA were analysed after controlling for baseline measures and different covariables (age, overweight, socioprofessional occupation), taking into account the cluster randomisation design.
RESULTS: The proportion of intervention adolescents not engaged in organised PA was reduced by 50% whereas it was unchanged among control students. After adjustment for baseline covariables, LOPA participation significantly increased among the intervention adolescents (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) (OR)=3.38 (1.42-8.05) in girls; 1.73 (1.12-2.66) in boys), while high SED was reduced (OR=0.54 (0.38-0.77) in girls; 0.52 (0.35-0.76) in boys). The intervention improved SELF in girls, whatever their baseline LOPA (P<10(-4)) and INTENT in girls with no baseline LOPA (P=0.04). SELF tended to improve in boys with no baseline LOPA, without reaching statistical significance. When included in the regression, follow-up LOPA was associated with improvement of SELF in girls (P=0.02) and of INTENT in girls with no baseline PA (P<0.02). The intervention effect was then attenuated.
CONCLUSION: After 6 months of intervention, ICAPS was associated with a significant improvement of activity patterns and psychological predictors, indicating a promising approach for modifying the long-term PA level of adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543228     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord


  19 in total

1.  The Whole-of-School Approach to Physical Activity: Findings From a National Sample of U.S. Secondary Students.

Authors:  Natalie Colabianchi; Jamie L Griffin; Sandy J Slater; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  "Whole-of-Community" Obesity Prevention: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities in Multilevel, Multicomponent Interventions.

Authors:  Ella Ewart-Pierce; María José Mejía Ruiz; Joel Gittelsohn
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2016-09

3.  The 'Golden Keys' to health - a healthy lifestyle intervention with randomized individual mentorship for overweight and obesity in adolescents.

Authors:  James G Wengle; Jill K Hamilton; Cedric Manlhiot; Timothy J Bradley; Debra K Katzman; Renee Sananes; Khosrow Adeli; Catherine S Birken; Arvin A Abadilla; Brian W McCrindle
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 4.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Hilary Caldwell; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-23

5.  A church-based intervention to change attitudes about physical activity among Black adolescent girls: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Wanda M Thompson; Diane Berry; Jie Hu
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.462

Review 6.  School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Rebecca L LaRocca
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

7.  Interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Femke De Meester; Frank J van Lenthe; Heleen Spittaels; Nanna Lien; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-12-06       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth.

Authors:  Mark S Tremblay; Allana G LeBlanc; Michelle E Kho; Travis J Saunders; Richard Larouche; Rachel C Colley; Gary Goldfield; Sarah Connor Gorber
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Intervening to Reduce Sedentary Behaviors and Childhood Obesity among School-Age Youth: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  May May Leung; Alen Agaronov; Kateryna Grytsenko; Ming-Chin Yeh
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2011-10-24

10.  The contribution of home, neighbourhood and school environmental factors in explaining physical activity among adolescents.

Authors:  Leen Haerens; Mietje Craeynest; Benedicte Deforche; Lea Maes; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2009-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.