Literature DB >> 15543172

The first cut is the deepest: basic surgical training in ophthalmology.

A Gibson1, M G Boulton, M P Watson, M J Moseley, P I Murray, A R Fielder.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the basic surgical training received by Senior House Officers (SHOs) in ophthalmology and the influence on training of sociodemographic and organisational factors.
METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of SHOs in recognised UK surgical training posts asking about laboratory training and facilities, surgical experience, demographic details, with the opportunity to add comments.
RESULTS: A total of 314/466 (67%) questionnaires were returned. In all, 67% had attended a basic surgical course, 40% had access to wet labs and 39% had spent time in a wet lab in the previous 6 months. The mean number of part phakoemulsification (phako) procedures performed per week was 0.79; the mean number of full phakos performed per week was 0.74. The number of part phakos performed was negatively correlated, and the number of full phakos completed was positively correlated, with length of time as an SHO. Respondents who had larger operating lists performed more full phakos per week (P<0.001). Compared to men, women were less likely to have access to a wet lab (P=0.013), had completed fewer full phakos per week (P=0.003), and were less likely to have completed 50 full phakos (P=0003). SHOs' comments revealed concerns about their limited 'hands on' experience.
CONCLUSIONS: There are significant shortcomings in the basic surgical training SHOs receive, particularly in relation to wet lab experience and opportunities to perform full intraocular procedures. SHOs themselves perceive their training as inadequate. Women are disadvantaged in both laboratory and patient-based training, but minority ethnic groups and those who qualified overseas are not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15543172     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  Gender differences in the acquisition of surgical skills: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Ali; Yousif Subhi; Charlotte Ringsted; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Perceptions of training in gonioscopy.

Authors:  Rui Feng; Sheila M H Luk; Clara Hoi Ka Wu; Laura Crawley; Ian Murdoch
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Evaluation of the learning curve of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery.

Authors:  Fatih Aslan; Berna Yuce; Zafer Oztas; Halil Ates
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 4.  25th RCOphth Congress, President's Session paper: 25 years of progress in surgical training.

Authors:  L Benjamin
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Ophthalmic surgical training following modernising medical careers: regional variation in experience across the UK.

Authors:  Ian As Rodrigues; Richard J Symes; Stephen Turner; Arti Sinha; Gordon Bowler; Wai H Chan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Step-by-step phacoemulsification training program for ophthalmology residents.

Authors:  Wang Yulan; Sheng Yaohua; Tao Jinhua; Wang Min
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Surgical Results of Phacoemulsification Performed by Residents: A Time-Trend Analysis in a Teaching Hospital from 2005 to 2021.

Authors:  Jiahn-Shing Lee; Chiun-Ho Hou; Ken-Kuo Lin
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.974

8.  Optimizing microsurgical skills with EEG neurofeedback.

Authors:  Tomas Ros; Merrick J Moseley; Philip A Bloom; Larry Benjamin; Lesley A Parkinson; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 3.288

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.