Literature DB >> 15542476

Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level.

K M Killinger1, C R Calkins, W J Umberger, D M Feuz, K M Eskridge.   

Abstract

To determine consumer sensory acceptance and value of beef steaks differing in marbling level (high = upper USDA Choice and low = USDA Select), but similar in Warner-Bratzler shear value, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two matched pairs of high- and low-marbled strip steaks, and had the opportunity to participate in a silent, sealed-bid auction to purchase steaks from the same strip loins as the samples. Consumers who purchased steaks also evaluated the steaks when prepared in their homes. Based on overall acceptability ratings, consumers were categorized into three groups: 1) those who consistently found high marbling more acceptable, 2) those who consistently found low marbling more acceptable, and 3) those who were indifferent. Consumers who evaluated at least one high-marbled and one low-marbled sample in their home were included in an evaluation environment analysis (n = 50). High-marbled steaks were rated higher (P < 0.01) in juiciness, flavor, and overall acceptability than low-marbled steaks. In Chicago, consumers tended to bid more (P < 0.10) for high-marbled steaks, whereas consumers in San Francisco did not. Consumers who found high-marbled steaks more acceptable and those who found low-marbled steaks more acceptable were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for the more acceptable product. Consumers who evaluated high- and low-marbled samples in both the laboratory and home environments rated high- and low-marbled samples similar (P > 0.10) in flavor, juiciness, tenderness and overall acceptability when evaluating the steaks in their homes. In addition, these consumers were willing to pay similar (P > 0.10) amounts for high- and low-marbled samples in both environments. Overall, consumers found high-marbled steaks to be more acceptable than low-marbled steaks in flavor and overall acceptability when tenderness differences were minimized in the laboratory environment. Consumers were willing to pay more for their preference, whether that preference was for high-marbled or low-marbled steaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542476     DOI: 10.2527/2004.82113294x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Fatty acid profile, mineral content, and palatability of beef from a multibreed Angus-Brahman population.

Authors:  Sarah Flowers; Heather Hamblen; Joel D Leal-Gutiérrez; Mauricio A Elzo; Dwain D Johnson; Raluca G Mateescu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Consumer Perception of Beef Quality and How to Control, Improve and Predict It? Focus on Eating Quality.

Authors:  Jingjing Liu; Marie-Pierre Ellies-Oury; Todor Stoyanchev; Jean-François Hocquette
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-13

3.  In-Line Estimation of Fat Marbling in Whole Beef Striploins (Longissimus lumborum) by NIR Hyperspectral Imaging. A Closer Look at the Role of Myoglobin.

Authors:  Jens Petter Wold; Lars Erik Solberg; Mari Øvrum Gaarder; Mats Carlehøg; Karen Wahlstrøm Sanden; Rune Rødbotten
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Red seaweed (Asparagopsis taxiformis) supplementation reduces enteric methane by over 80 percent in beef steers.

Authors:  Breanna M Roque; Marielena Venegas; Robert D Kinley; Rocky de Nys; Toni L Duarte; Xiang Yang; Ermias Kebreab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluating the Shelf Life and Sensory Properties of Beef Steaks from Cattle Raised on Different Grass Feeding Systems in the Western United States.

Authors:  Toni L Duarte; Bakytzhan Bolkenov; Sarah C Klopatek; James W Oltjen; D Andy King; Steven D Shackelford; Tommy L Wheeler; Xiang Yang
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Effects of different dietary energy and protein levels and sex on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of F1 Angus × Chinese Xiangxi yellow cattle.

Authors:  Lingyan Li; Yuankui Zhu; Xianyou Wang; Yang He; Binghai Cao
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2014-04-16

Review 7.  Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.

Authors:  Rhonda Miller
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-03

8.  Beef Quality Preferences: Factors Driving Consumer Satisfaction.

Authors:  Chad Felderhoff; Conrad Lyford; Jaime Malaga; Rod Polkinghorne; Chance Brooks; Andrea Garmyn; Mark Miller
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-03-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.