Literature DB >> 15542475

Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color.

K M Killinger1, C R Calkins, W J Umberger, D M Feuz, K M Eskridge.   

Abstract

To determine visual preference and value for fresh beef steaks differing in marbling level and color, consumers in Chicago and San Francisco (n = 124 per city) evaluated two pairs of steaks in a retail case. Steaks differing in marbling level (Modest/Moderate vs. Slight) and color (bright, cherry-red vs. dark red) were purchased at retail stores in each city. Consumers selected their preferred steak in each pair, described their selection criteria, and provided the price they were willing to pay for each of the four steaks. There was a difference in visual preference in each city, with most consumers preferring (P < 0.01) low (Slight) over high (Moderate/Modest) marbling; however, more (P < 0.01) consumers in Chicago (86.7%) preferred low marbling than in San Francisco (67.0%). Selection criteria were categorized into five groups: marbling, fat, color, appearance, and palatability. Marbling was mentioned by 65.4% of consumers who preferred high marbling, whereas 64.9% of consumers who preferred low marbling mentioned fat as a selection criterion. Bright, cherry-red color was preferred by a higher (P < 0.01) percentage of consumers in both Chicago and San Francisco (67.6 and 76.5%, respectively). Color was mentioned both by consumers who preferred bright, cherry-red color (64.8%) and those who preferred dark red color (63.9%). All preference groups were willing to pay more for their preferred steak (P < 0.01), but consumers who preferred low marbling were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for their preferred steak than consumers who preferred high marbling. Consumers who preferred bright, cherry-red color were willing to pay more (P < 0.01) for their preferred steak than consumers who preferred dark red color. Consumers who preferred low marbling seemed to desire lean products, and consumers who preferred high marbling seemed to desire products with high eating quality. In this study, consumers were willing to pay more to purchase their preferred product; however, most consumers preferred low marbling and bright, cherry-red color.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542475     DOI: 10.2527/2004.82113288x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  12 in total

1.  Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.

Authors:  Sarah Flowers; Brandon R McFadden; Chad C Carr; Raluca G Mateescu
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Grass-fed vs. grain-fed beef systems: performance, economic, and environmental trade-offs.

Authors:  Sarah C Klopatek; Elias Marvinney; Toni Duarte; Alissa Kendall; Xiang Crystal Yang; James W Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Bovine gene polymorphisms related to fat deposition and meat tenderness.

Authors:  Marina R S Fortes; Rogério A Curi; Luis Artur L Chardulo; Antonio C Silveira; Mayra E O D Assumpção; José Antonio Visintin; Henrique N de Oliveira
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

4.  The microbiology of beef from carcass chilling through primal storage to retail steaks.

Authors:  Siobhán McSharry; Leonard Koolman; Paul Whyte; Declan Bolton
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2021-03-13

5.  Effectiveness of a New Recombinant antiGnRH Vaccine for Immunocastration in Bulls.

Authors:  Paula R Huenchullan; Sonia Vidal; Rafael Larraín; Leonardo Saénz
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Effect of 2,4-thiazolidinedione on limousin cattle growth and on muscle and adipose tissue metabolism.

Authors:  M Arévalo-Turrubiarte; L González-Dávalos; A Yabuta; J D Garza; J L Dávalos; O Mora; A Shimada
Journal:  PPAR Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Effects of Procyanidin on Meat Quality and Shelf-Life for Preserving Pork Patties during Chilled Storage.

Authors:  Jin Young Jeong; Kuk-Hwan Seol; Pil-Nam Seong; Beom-Young Park; Hyoun Wook Kim
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 8.  How Muscle Structure and Composition Influence Meat and Flesh Quality.

Authors:  Anne Listrat; Bénédicte Lebret; Isabelle Louveau; Thierry Astruc; Muriel Bonnet; Louis Lefaucheur; Brigitte Picard; Jérôme Bugeon
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2016-02-28

9.  Common Visual Preference for Curved Contours in Humans and Great Apes.

Authors:  Enric Munar; Gerardo Gómez-Puerto; Josep Call; Marcos Nadal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Drivers of Consumer Liking for Beef, Pork, and Lamb: A Review.

Authors:  Rhonda Miller
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2020-04-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.