Literature DB >> 15542262

Influence of direct referrals on time to diagnosis after an abnormal breast screening result.

Kathleen M Decker1, Marion Harrison, Daniel Chateau.   

Abstract

This study examined the influence of a direct referral process implemented by a population-based provincial breast screening program on the time from screening to first procedure, first procedure to diagnosis, and screening to diagnosis following an abnormal breast screening result. The direct referral process shifted the responsibility for the coordination of diagnostic follow-up procedures from the family physician to the screening program. Three cohorts of women were included: a control cohort (screened prior to the initiation of a direct referral process, n = 1347), a usual care cohort (screened after the initiation of a direct referral process but for whom permission to refer was denied by the family physician, n = 1225), and a direct referral cohort (screened after the initiation of the direct referral process and for whom permission to refer was given by the family physician, n = 1232). The direct referral cohort was subdivided into women referred to a breast health centre (BHC group) (n = 606) and women referred to a diagnostic facility (diagnostic group) (n = 626). The direct referral cohort completed all three time intervals significantly faster than the other two cohorts (P < 0.0001). The diagnostic group experienced a significantly lower time from screening to the first procedure than the other cohorts or the BHC group (P < 0.0001). However, the BHC group had a significantly lower time from first procedure to diagnosis than the other cohorts or the diagnostic group (P < 0.0001). The control and the usual care cohorts were not significantly different from each other (P = 0.6250). The direct referral process significantly reduced the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15542262     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2004.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  10 in total

Review 1.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Effect of screening result on waiting times to assessment and breast cancer diagnosis: results from the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Verna Mai; Erika E Halapy; Rene S Shumak; Frances P O'Malley; Neil S Klar
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

3.  Racial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Xilong Li; Jasmin Tiro; Pragathi Kandunoori; Beverley Adams-Huet; Mahendra S Nehra; Adam Yopp
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Meta-analysis: underutilisation and disparities of treatment among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  D Tan; A Yopp; M S Beg; P Gopal; A G Singal
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammogram: variability of facilities.

Authors:  Robert D Rosenberg; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Berta M Geller; Diana S M Buist; Diana L Miglioretti; R James Brenner; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Timeliness of breast cancer diagnosis and initiation of treatment in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1996-2005.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; Janet Royalty; William Howe; William Helsel; William Kammerer; Vicki B Benard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Facilitated "fast track" referral reduces time from abnormal screening mammogram to diagnosis.

Authors:  Marilyn J Borugian; Lisa Kan; Christina C Y Chu; Kathy Ceballos; Karen A Gelmon; Paula B Gordon; Barbara Poole; Scott Tyldesley; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug

8.  Effect of specialized diagnostic assessment units on the time to diagnosis in screen-detected breast cancer patients.

Authors:  L Jiang; J Gilbert; H Langley; R Moineddin; P A Groome
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluating wait times from screening to breast cancer diagnosis among women undergoing organised assessment vs usual care.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Derek Muradali; Kristina M Blackmore; Courtney R Smith; Lucia Mirea; Vicky Majpruz; Frances P O'Malley; May Lynn Quan; Claire Mb Holloway
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical and prognostic factors associated with diagnostic wait times by breast cancer detection method.

Authors:  Amalia Plotogea; Anna M Chiarelli; Lucia Mirea; Maegan V Prummel; Nelson Chong; Rene S Shumak; Frances P O'Malley; Claire Mb Holloway
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-03-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.