Literature DB >> 15542130

Cementless implant fixation--toward improved reliability.

Robert M Pilliar1.   

Abstract

Cementless implants offer the advantage of fixation by direct bone-to-implant osseointegration, thereby avoiding the use of a synthetic intermediary material (such as acrylic bone cement) of limited mechanical strength. Successful osseointegration, however, depends on several conditions being satisfied during the peri-implant bone healing period, including the need for limited early loading resulting in minimal relative movement at the implant-bone interface. Sintered porous- and plasma spray-coated implants represent the most common cementless orthopedic implants in current clinical use, although novel cast structures also are being investigated. All stand to benefit from surface modifications currently being explored to enhance osteoconductive or osteoinductive characteristics of the implants. The faster osseointegration that such modified surface designs potentially might offer would result in more reliable and convenient (from the patient perspective) cementless implants. Encouraging results of early animal-based studies exploring such modifications have been reported.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15542130     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2004.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  8 in total

1.  Successful long-term fixation and progression of osteolysis associated with first-generation cementless acetabular components retrieved post mortem.

Authors:  Robert M Urban; Deborah J Hall; Craig Della Valle; Markus A Wimmer; Joshua J Jacobs; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The effect of integrin-specific bioactive coatings on tissue healing and implant osseointegration.

Authors:  Timothy A Petrie; Jenny E Raynor; Catherine D Reyes; Kellie L Burns; David M Collard; Andrés J García
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 12.479

3.  The basic science of peri-implant bone healing.

Authors:  Paul Rt Kuzyk; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Nanotechnology and dental implants.

Authors:  Sandrine Lavenus; Guy Louarn; Pierre Layrolle
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2010-12-28

5.  Effects of graphene plates' adoption on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and in vivo biocompatibility of calcium silicate coating.

Authors:  Youtao Xie; Hongqin Li; Chuanxian Ding; Xuebin Zheng; Kai Li
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-06-08

6.  Optimized Surface Characteristics and Enhanced in Vivo Osseointegration of Alkali-Treated Titanium with Nanonetwork Structures.

Authors:  Yuhao Zeng; Yuanyuan Yang; Luyuan Chen; Derong Yin; Honghao Zhang; Yuichiro Tashiro; Shihoko Inui; Tetsuji Kusumoto; Hiroshi Nishizaki; Tohru Sekino; Joji Okazaki; Satoshi Komasa
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Effectiveness of photofunctionalized titanium alloy on osseointegration in rats with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Shengdao Jin; Yuji Yamamoto; Yoshifumi Harada; Sho Kaneko; Kazuki Oishi; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 2.677

8.  The effects of hierarchical micro/nanosurfaces decorated with TiO2 nanotubes on the bioactivity of titanium implants in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Xianglong Ding; Lei Zhou; Jingxu Wang; Qingxia Zhao; Xi Lin; Yan Gao; Shaobing Li; Jingyi Wu; Mingdeng Rong; Zehong Guo; Chunhua Lai; Haibin Lu; Fang Jia
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-11-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.