Literature DB >> 15541676

Design rationale and biomechanics of Maverick Total Disc arthroplasty with early clinical results.

Hallett H Mathews1, Jean-Charles Lehuec, Tai Friesem, Thomas Zdeblick, Lukas Eisermann.   

Abstract

This paper reviews the design criteria, biomechanical and biological (wear and safety) testing of this chrome cobalt metal-on-metal, ball and socket design prosthesis. The surgical technique and early clinical results of the initial implantations are also reviewed. Initial results of 7 Maverick implantations showed all 7 patients attaining a 15 point Oswestry improvement within 3 months after implantation. This early result in a small sample is significantly quicker in recovery and improvement when compared to the historical control of the LT cage with Infuse IDE study. Longer term results and more careful study are needed of this interesting and optimistic finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541676     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Lumbar disc arthroplasty. Established technique or experimental procedure?].

Authors:  T L Schulte; V Bullmann; T Lerner; H F Halm; U Liljenqvist; L Hackenberg
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Evaluation of impingement behaviour in lumbar spinal disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas M Grupp; James J Yue; Rolando Garcia; Christian Kaddick; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Jens Schwiesau; Wilhelm Blömer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long-term outcome after implantation of prosthetic disc nucleus device (PDN) in lumbar disc disease.

Authors:  P Selviaridis; N Foroglou; A Tsitlakidis; A Hatzisotiriou; I Magras; I Patsalas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Maverick total disc replacement in a real-world patient population: a prospective, multicentre, observational study.

Authors:  Richard Assaker; Karsten Ritter-Lang; Dominique Vardon; Stéphane Litrico; Stéphane Fuentes; Michael Putzier; Jörg Franke; Peter Jarzem; Pierre Guigui; Gérard Nakach; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prospective study on serum metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal lumbar disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew F Gornet; J K Burkus; M L Harper; F W Chan; A K Skipor; J J Jacobs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The Incidence of Potential Candidates for Total Disc Replacement among Lumbar and Cervical Fusion Patient Populations.

Authors:  Martin Quirno; Jeffrey A Goldstein; John A Bendo; Yong Kim; Jeffrey M Spivak
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2011-11-28

7.  Interaction of micron and nano-sized particles with cells of the dura mater.

Authors:  Iraklis Papageorgiou; Rainy Marsh; Joanne L Tipper; Richard M Hall; John Fisher; Eileen Ingham
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.368

8.  Clinical performance of an elastomeric lumbar disc replacement: Minimum 12 months follow-up.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Raul Springmuller; Casey K Lee; Leonardo Oliveira; Sandra E Roth; William F Ogilvie
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01

9.  ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.

Authors:  Jack Zigler; Rolando Garcia
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-03-12

Review 10.  Pseudotumor after total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Muadh AlZeedi; Salim Al Rawahi; Mashael Muwanis; Thamer M Alraiyes; Humaid Al Farii; Peter Jarzem
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.