Literature DB >> 15541081

Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.

A Blum1, H Luedtke, U Ellwanger, R Schwabe, G Rassner, C Garbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital image analysis has been introduced into the diagnosis of skin lesions based on dermoscopic pictures.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a computer algorithm for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with the results of established dermoscopic classification rules.
METHODS: In the Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Germany, 837 melanocytic skin lesions were prospectively imaged by a dermoscopy video system in consecutive patients. Of these lesions, 269 were excised and examined by histopathology: 84 were classified as cutaneous melanomas and 185 as benign melanocytic naevi. The remaining 568 lesions were diagnosed by dermoscopy as benign. Digital image analysis was performed in all 837 benign and malignant melanocytic lesions using 64 different analytical parameters.
RESULTS: For lesions imaged completely (diameter < or = 12 mm), three analytical parameters were found to distinguish clearly between benign and malignant lesions, while in incompletely imaged lesions six parameters enabled differentiation. Based on the respective parameters and logistic regression analysis, a diagnostic computer algorithm for melanocytic lesions was developed. Its diagnostic accuracy was 82% for completely imaged and 84% for partially imaged lesions. All 837 melanocytic lesions were classified by established dermoscopic algorithms and the diagnostic accuracy was found to be in the same range (ABCD rule 78%, Menzies' score 83%, seven-point checklist 88%, and seven features for melanoma 81%).
CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic algorithm for digital image analysis of melanocytic lesions can achieve the same range of diagnostic accuracy as the application of dermoscopic classification rules by experts. The present diagnostic algorithm, however, still requires a medical expert who is qualified to recognize cutaneous lesions as being of melanocytic origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541081     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06210.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  17 in total

1.  A methodological approach to the classification of dermoscopy images.

Authors:  M Emre Celebi; Hassan A Kingravi; Bakhtiyar Uddin; Hitoshi Iyatomi; Y Alp Aslandogan; William V Stoecker; Randy H Moss
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Strategies for early melanoma detection: Approaches to the patient with nevi.

Authors:  Agnessa Gadeliya Goodson; Douglas Grossman
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 3.  Distribution quantification on dermoscopy images for computer-assisted diagnosis of cutaneous melanomas.

Authors:  Zhao Liu; Jiuai Sun; Lyndon Smith; Melvyn Smith; Robert Warr
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Combination of 3D skin surface texture features and 2D ABCD features for improved melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Yi Ding; Nigel W John; Lyndon Smith; Jiuai Sun; Melvyn Smith
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Fully Automated Approach for Early Detection of Pigmented Skin Lesion Diagnosis Using ABCD.

Authors:  Mai S Mabrouk; Ahmed Y Sayed; Heba M Afifi; Mariam A Sheha; Amr Sharwy
Journal:  J Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2020-03-03

Review 6.  Melanoma Early Detection: Big Data, Bigger Picture.

Authors:  Tracy Petrie; Ravikant Samatham; Alexander M Witkowski; Andre Esteva; Sancy A Leachman
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.551

Review 7.  Current and emerging technologies in melanoma diagnosis: the state of the art.

Authors:  Estee L Psaty; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

Review 8.  [New optical examination procedures for the diagnosis of skin diseases].

Authors:  K Sies; J K Winkler; M Zieger; M Kaatz; H A Haenssle
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.751

9.  Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images.

Authors:  Michael A Marchetti; Noel C F Codella; Stephen W Dusza; David A Gutman; Brian Helba; Aadi Kalloo; Nabin Mishra; Cristina Carrera; M Emre Celebi; Jennifer L DeFazio; Natalia Jaimes; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elizabeth Quigley; Alon Scope; Oriol Yélamos; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Lacunarity analysis: a promising method for the automated assessment of melanocytic naevi and melanoma.

Authors:  Stephen Gilmore; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Jim Muir; H Peter Soyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.