Literature DB >> 15540206

Comparison of genomic abnormalities between BRCAX and sporadic breast cancers studied by comparative genomic hybridization.

Jacek Gronwald1, Anna Jauch, Cezary Cybulski, Brigitte Schoell, Barbara Böhm-Steuer, Marcin Lener, Ewa Grabowska, Bohdan Górski, Anna Jakubowska, Wenancjusz Domagała, Maria Chosia, Rodney J Scott, Jan Lubiński.   

Abstract

Very little is known about the chromosomal regions harbouring genes involved in initiation and progression of BRCAX-associated breast cancers. We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to identify the most frequent genomic imbalances in 18 BRCAX hereditary breast cancers and compared them to chromosomal aberrations detected in a group of 27 sporadic breast cancers. The aberrations observed most frequently in BRCAX tumours were gains of 8q (83%), 19q (67%), 19p (61%), 20q (61%), 1q (56%), 17q (56%) and losses of 8p (56%), 11q (44%) and 13q (33%). The sporadic cases most frequently showed gains of 1q (67%), 8q (48%), 17q (37%), 16p (33%), 19q (33%) and losses of 11q (26%), 8p (22%) and 16q (19%). Losses of 8p and gains 8q, 19 as well as gains of 20q (with respect to ductal tumours only) were detected significantly more often in BRCAX than in sporadic breast cancers. Analysis of 8p-losses and 8q-gains showed that these aberrations are early events in the tumorigenesis of BRCAX tumors. The findings of this report indicate similarities between BRCAX and BRCA2 tumours, possibly suggesting a common pathway of disease. These findings need confirmation by more extensive studies because only a limited number of cases were analysed and there are relatively few reports published. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15540206     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  14 in total

1.  ATBF1 inhibits estrogen receptor (ER) function by selectively competing with AIB1 for binding to the ER in ER-positive breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Xue-Yuan Dong; Xiaodong Sun; Peng Guo; Qunna Li; Masakiyo Sasahara; Yoko Ishii; Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Infrequent mutation of ATBF1 in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Sun; Yingfa Zhou; Kristen B Otto; Mingrong Wang; Ceshi Chen; Wei Zhou; Krithika Subramanian; Paula M Vertino; Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  The complex genetic landscape of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Melchor; Javier Benítez
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  A genome wide linkage search for breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Paula Smith; Lesley McGuffog; Douglas F Easton; Graham J Mann; Gulietta M Pupo; Beth Newman; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Csilla Szabo; Melissa Southey; Hélène Renard; Fabrice Odefrey; Henry Lynch; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Fergus Couch; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles; Margaret R E McCredie; Saundra Buys; Irene Andrulis; Ruby Senie; David E Goldgar; Rogier Oldenburg; Karin Kroeze-Jansema; Jaennelle Kraan; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Jan G M Klijn; Christi van Asperen; Inge van Leeuwen; Hans F A Vasen; Cees J Cornelisse; Peter Devilee; Linda Baskcomb; Sheila Seal; Rita Barfoot; Jon Mangion; Anita Hall; Sarah Edkins; Elizabeth Rapley; Richard Wooster; Jenny Chang-Claude; Diana Eccles; D Gareth Evans; P Andrew Futreal; Katherine L Nathanson; Barbara L Weber; Nazneen Rahman; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Exome sequencing of germline DNA from non-BRCA1/2 familial breast cancer cases selected on the basis of aCGH tumor profiling.

Authors:  Florentine S Hilbers; Caro M Meijers; Jeroen F J Laros; Michiel van Galen; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Hans F A Vasen; Petra M Nederlof; Juul T Wijnen; Christi J van Asperen; Peter Devilee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Array-CGH and breast cancer.

Authors:  Erik H van Beers; Petra M Nederlof
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Establishment and characterisation of a new breast cancer xenograft obtained from a woman carrying a germline BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  L de Plater; A Laugé; C Guyader; M-F Poupon; F Assayag; P de Cremoux; A Vincent-Salomon; D Stoppa-Lyonnet; B Sigal-Zafrani; J-J Fontaine; R Brough; C J Lord; A Ashworth; P Cottu; D Decaudin; E Marangoni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  DNA copy number profiling reveals extensive genomic loss in hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  M M Kamieniak; I Muñoz-Repeto; D Rico; A Osorio; M Urioste; J García-Donas; S Hernando; L Robles-Díaz; T Ramón Y Cajal; A Cazorla; R Sáez; J M García-Bueno; S Domingo; S Borrego; J Palacios; M A van de Wiel; B Ylstra; J Benítez; M J García
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  VEGF, HIF-1α expression and MVD as an angiogenic network in familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Concetta Saponaro; Andrea Malfettone; Girolamo Ranieri; Katia Danza; Giovanni Simone; Angelo Paradiso; Anita Mangia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Breast tumors with elevated expression of 1q candidate genes confer poor clinical outcome and sensitivity to Ras/PI3K inhibition.

Authors:  Muthulakshmi Muthuswami; Vignesh Ramesh; Saikat Banerjee; Soundara Viveka Thangaraj; Jayaprakash Periasamy; Divya Bhaskar Rao; Georgina D Barnabas; Swetha Raghavan; Kumaresan Ganesan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.