Literature DB >> 15539807

Liquid growth hormone: preservatives and buffers.

Anne-Marie Kappelgaard1, Anders Bojesen, Karsten Skydsgaard, Ingrid Sjögren, Torben Laursen.   

Abstract

Growth hormone (GH) treatment is a successful medical therapy for children and adults with GH deficiency as well as for growth retardation due to chronic renal disease, Turner syndrome and in children born small for gestational age. For all of these conditions, treatment is long term and patients receive daily subcutaneous injections of GH for many years. Patient compliance is therefore of critical importance to ensure treatment benefit. One of the major factors influencing compliance is injection pain. Besides the injection device used, pain perception and local tissue reaction following injection are dependent on the preservative used in the formulation and the concentration of GH. Injection pain may also be related to the buffer substance and injection volume. A liquid formulation of GH, Norditropi SimpleXx, has been developed that dispenses with the need for reconstitution before administration. The formulation uses phenol (3 mg/ml) as a preservative (to protect product from microbial degradation or contamination) and histidine as a buffer. Alternative preservatives used in other GH formulations include m-cresol (9 mg/ml) and benzyl alcohol (3-9 mg/ml). Buffering agents include citrate and phosphate. Phenol has been successfully used as a preservative in drug formulations for more than 50 years and is considered a safe and effective agent which complies with strict international requirements for preservatives in drug formulations. In toxicological studies, no or only mild local reactions have been observed following subcutaneous administration of phenol (7.5 mg/ml), m-cresol (3-4 mg/ml) and benzyl alcohol (9 mg/ml). No general toxicity reactions were observed after subcutaneous administration of these agents. Clinical evaluation of the preservatives and buffers used in Norditropin SimpleXx showed that pain perception was similar between formulations containing phenol and benzyl alcohol, whereas m-cresol was associated with more painful injections than benzyl alcohol. Furthermore, patients reported more pain following injection of a citrate-buffered solution than after a histidine-buffered solution. More pain was also reported following large volume injections and following injections with solutions containing high protein concentrations. In summary, optimization of the preservative and buffer content of a liquid GH formulation may reduce injection pain and lead to improved patient compliance. 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15539807     DOI: 10.1159/000080507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Res        ISSN: 0301-0163


  11 in total

1.  Subcutaneous Injection Site Pain of Formulation Matrices.

Authors:  Galen H Shi; Karthik Pisupati; Jonathan G Parker; Vincent J Corvari; Christopher D Payne; Wen Xu; David S Collins; Michael R De Felippis
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Oxidation of free L-histidine by tert-Butylhydroperoxide.

Authors:  Bruce D Mason; Melissa McCracken; Edward J Bures; Bruce A Kerwin
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Golimumab: A novel human anti-TNF-alpha monoclonal antibody for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis.

Authors:  Jonathan Kay; Mahboob U Rahman
Journal:  Core Evid       Date:  2010-06-15

4.  Multi-Electrode Array of Sensory Neurons as an In Vitro Platform to Identify the Nociceptive Response to Pharmaceutical Buffer Systems of Injectable Biologics.

Authors:  Muriel Eaton; Zhefu Que; Jingliang Zhang; Kaethe Beck; Riyi Shi; Jeff McDermott; Michael Ladisch; Yang Yang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Growth Hormone Deficiency in India.

Authors:  Mathew John; Ekaterina Koledova; Kanakatte Mylariah Prasanna Kumar; Harshal Chaudhari
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.257

6.  An integrative toolbox to unlock the structure and dynamics of protein-surfactant complexes.

Authors:  Adrian Sanchez-Fernandez; Carl Diehl; Judith E Houston; Anna E Leung; James P Tellam; Sarah E Rogers; Sylvain Prevost; Stefan Ulvenlund; Helen Sjögren; Marie Wahlgren
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-07-13

Review 7.  New insight into the importance of formulation variables on parenteral growth hormone preparations: potential effect on the injection-site pain.

Authors:  Bita Taghizadeh; Mahmoud Reza Jaafari; Nosratollah Zarghami
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Product wastage from modern human growth hormone administration devices: a laboratory and computer simulation analysis.

Authors:  Richard F Pollock; Yujun Qian; Tami Wisniewski; Lisa Seitz; Anne-Marie Kappelgaard
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 9.  Subcutaneous Injection of Drugs: Literature Review of Factors Influencing Pain Sensation at the Injection Site.

Authors:  Iris Usach; Rafael Martinez; Teodora Festini; José-Esteban Peris
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 10.  Understanding and Minimising Injection-Site Pain Following Subcutaneous Administration of Biologics: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Anja St Clair-Jones; Francesca Prignano; Joao Goncalves; Muriel Paul; Philipp Sewerin
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2020-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.