Literature DB >> 15538663

[200 years testing hearing disorders with speech, 50 years german speech audiometry -- a review].

H Feldmann1.   

Abstract

FROM THE BEGINNIGS TO CLASSICAL SPEECH TESTS: The need for classification of different degrees of hearing disorders first arose when it seemed possible to treat deafness. Grapengiesser in Berlin 1801 had applied galvanic current to the ears of deaf children and reported some success. Pfingsten in Kiel in 1804 using this method was the first to use speech in diagnosing different degrees of deafness. He divided speech sounds into three classes: vowels, voiced consonants and voiceless consonants. Itard in Paris in 1821 gave a classification of five classes according to which sounds could be perceived, starting from normal speech to thunder and the bang of a gun. Schmalz in Dresden 1846 noted the range within which speech was understood thus introducing the concept of hearing distance. Helmholtz in 1863 had demonstrated that vowels are composed of pure tones. Wolf in Frankfurt 1871 tried to align all speech sounds from the lowest frequency (tongue-R = 16 Hz) to the highest (sh = 4096 Hz) and measured the hearing distance for each sound. Following these suggestions word lists based on the predominant frequencies were compiled in a number of languages including Japanese. SPEECH AUDIOMETRY: This chapter is devoted to Karl Heinz HahIbrock, Freiburg, who was the founder of the German speech audiometry. Hahlbrock followed the American authors of the Psycho-acoustic Laboratory at Harvard, in particular J. P. Egan (1948), using statistical methods for composing lists of words based on the relative frequency of speech sounds and phonetically balanced between the different groups. He finally presented a test comprising groups of two-digit numbers and monosyllabic words. Hahlbrock died in 2003 exactly fifty years after the presentation of his test. A short account of his life is given. THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT: In the following years various other types of speech tests were elaborated using sentences, distorted speech, diotic and dichotic presentation partly aimed at fitting hearing aids, partly with the aim to diagnose central hearing disorders. Hahlbrock's test, however, remained the standard for evaluating speech reception and discrimination. DISCUSSION: One of the fundamental problems in testing speech discrimination is that there is no catalogue of phonemes common to all languages or regional accents. Untrained not native speakers often do no perceive certain sounds having a partial auditory agnosia. They cannot distinguish between e. g. 'hand' and 'and' or 'end' and 'ant', but the examiner must decide if the word presented was repeated correctly or not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538663     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  4 in total

1.  [The Freiburg monosyllable word test in postoperative cochlear implant diagnostics].

Authors:  M Hey; G Brademann; P Ambrosch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  [The Freiburg speech intelligibility test : A pillar of speech audiometry in German-speaking countries].

Authors:  S Hoth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Where do we come from? Where are we? Where are we going? : President's speech at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery on the occasion of its centennial.

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.330

Review 4.  [Where do we come from? Where are we? Where are we going? : President's speech at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery on the occasion of its centennial. German version].

Authors:  Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.