Literature DB >> 15538570

A phase IB clinical and pharmacokinetic study of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck.

Matthew M Cooney1, Kou-Yi Tserng, Vinit Makar, R Jeff McPeak, Stephen T Ingalls, Afshin Dowlati, Beth Overmoyer, Keith McCrae, Pamela Ksenich, Pierre Lavertu, Percy Ivy, Charles L Hoppel, Scot Remick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: SU5416 is a novel small organic molecule that non-competitively inhibits the phosphorylation of the VEGF tyrosine kinase receptor, Flk-1. This phase IB study was performed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of SU5416 and paclitaxel in recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck.
METHODS: Enrolled in the study were 12 patients with biopsy-proven recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck. Six patients received intravenous SU5416 110 mg/m2 on days 1, 15, 18, 22 and 25, and paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 on days 8, 15 and 22. Since two patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cohort 1, the next six patients received identical treatment as above except the paclitaxel dose was reduced to 55 mg/m2 per week.
RESULTS: A total of 42 cycles at two different dose levels were given. In cohort 1 there were two deep venous thromboses that were DLTs. In the second cohort there was a DLT consisting of a transient ischemic attack after receiving SU5416. Most of the other toxicities seen were grade 1 or 2 in nature and consisted of headache, facial flushing, and fatigue. Two patients developed extensive ulcerative cavities at sites of prior radiation. There were no significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of SU5416 given with paclitaxel. Four patients had prolonged freedom from progression of 18, 28, 42, and 60 weeks duration.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SU5416 with paclitaxel had a higher than expected incidence of thromboembolic events and prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered for future trials that combine an angiogenesis inhibitor with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Although the future development of SU5416 as a chemotherapeutic agent is unclear, there was a clinical benefit seen with this combination in 36% of the patients. This trial supports the use of developing antiangiogenic combinations, using molecular targeted agents, in head and neck carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538570     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-004-0871-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  14 in total

Review 1.  Noncardiac vascular toxicities of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in advanced cancer: a review.

Authors:  Dorothy Keefe; Joanne Bowen; Rachel Gibson; Thean Tan; Meena Okera; Andrea Stringer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-03-25

2.  Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor receptor with AZD4547 mitigates juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma.

Authors:  Tran Le; Jacob New; Joel W Jones; Shireen Usman; Sreeya Yalamanchali; Ossama Tawfik; Larry Hoover; Dan E Bruegger; Sufi Mary Thomas
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.858

3.  Phase I dose-finding study of sorafenib in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin as a first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Jae-Lyun Lee; Yoon Hee Choi; Byung Woog Kang; Min-Hee Ryu; Heung Moon Chang; Tae Won Kim; Yoon-Koo Kang
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  A Phase II study of SU5416 in patients with advanced or recurrent head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Matthew G Fury; Andrew Zahalsky; Richard Wong; Ennapadam Venkatraman; Eric Lis; Lucy Hann; Timothy Aliff; William Gerald; Martin Fleisher; David G Pfister
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-09-16       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Regulation of invasive behavior by vascular endothelial growth factor is HEF1-dependent.

Authors:  J T Lucas; B P Salimath; M G Slomiany; S A Rosenzweig
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  The VEGF pathway in cancer and disease: responses, resistance, and the path forward.

Authors:  Mark W Kieran; Raghu Kalluri; Yoon-Jae Cho
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  What is the risk of intracranial bleeding during anti-VEGF therapy?

Authors:  Craig P Carden; James M G Larkin; Mark A Rosenthal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  A phase II trial of fosbretabulin in advanced anaplastic thyroid carcinoma and correlation of baseline serum-soluble intracellular adhesion molecule-1 with outcome.

Authors:  Colin J Mooney; Govardhanan Nagaiah; Pingfu Fu; Jay K Wasman; Matthew M Cooney; Panos S Savvides; Joseph A Bokar; Afshin Dowlati; Ding Wang; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Susan M Flick; Paul H Hartman; Jose D Ortiz; Pierre N Lavertu; Scot C Remick
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.568

9.  Phase I study of SU5416, a small molecule inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) in refractory pediatric central nervous system tumors.

Authors:  Mark W Kieran; Jeffrey G Supko; Dana Wallace; Robert Fruscio; Tina Young Poussaint; Peter Phillips; Ian Pollack; Roger Packer; James M Boyett; Susan Blaney; Anu Banerjee; Russ Geyer; Henry Friedman; Stewart Goldman; Larry E Kun; Tobey Macdonald
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.167

10.  A Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor SU5416 (semaxanib) in solid tumours, incorporating dynamic contrast MR pharmacodynamic end points.

Authors:  A O'Donnell; A Padhani; C Hayes; A J Kakkar; M Leach; J M Trigo; M Scurr; F Raynaud; S Phillips; W Aherne; A Hardcastle; P Workman; A Hannah; I Judson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.