Literature DB >> 15538242

Prognosis of patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy: long-term results.

Siamak Daneshmand1, Marcus L Quek, John P Stein, Gary Lieskovsky, Jie Cai, Jacek Pinski, Eila C Skinner, Donald G Skinner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the prognostic factors that affect recurrence and survival in patients with lymph node positive prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1972 and 1999, 1,936 patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically organ confined prostate cancer. A total of 235 patients (12.1%) were found to have disease metastatic to the lymph nodes (stage D1). Of the patients 69% received no adjuvant treatment. We reviewed the tumor stage (TNM), Gleason score, number and percent of involved lymph nodes (lymph node density), preoperative prostate specific antigen when available and adjuvant treatment. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots.
RESULTS: Followup was 1 to 24 years (median 11.4). Overall median survival was 15 years. Overall clinical recurrence-free survival at 5, 10 and 15 years was 80%, 65% and 58%, respectively. Patients who had 1 or 2 positive lymph nodes had a clinical recurrence-free survival of 70% and 73% at 10 years, respectively, vs 49% in those who had 5 or more involved lymph nodes (p = 0.0031). When stratified by lymph node density, patients with a lymph node density of 20% or greater were at higher risk for clinical recurrence compared to those with a density of less than 20% (relative risk = 2.32, p <0.0001). On stratified log rank test only prostate cancer T stage, and the number and percent of positive lymph nodes correlated with recurrence-free and overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Local tumor bulk and the number/percent of involved lymph nodes significantly affect disease progression and the survival rate. Radical prostatectomy may offer long-term survival in patients who have limited tumor bulk and nodal involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538242     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143448.04161.cc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  71 in total

1.  Preoperative sentinel lymph node mapping of the prostate using PET/CT fusion imaging and Ga-68-labeled tilmanocept in an animal model.

Authors:  Sean P Stroup; Christopher J Kane; Salman Farchshchi-Heydari; Claude M James; Christopher H Davis; Anne M Wallace; Carl K Hoh; David R Vera
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Why all prostate cancer surgery should include an adequate lymph node dissection.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  [The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in clinically localised prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Schumacher; F C Burkhard; U E Studer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Kaiser Permanente Southern California: 15-Year Experience.

Authors:  Pooya Banapour; Andrew Schumacher; Jane C Lin; David S Finley
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

5.  The total number of retroperitoneal lymph nodes resected impacts clinical outcome after chemotherapy for metastatic testicular cancer.

Authors:  Brett S Carver; Angel M Cronin; Scott Eggener; Caroline J Savage; Robert J Motzer; Dean Bajorin; George J Bosl; Joel Sheinfeld
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Integrating chemohormonal therapy and surgery in known or suspected lymph node metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  A J Zurita; L L Pisters; X Wang; P Troncoso; P Dieringer; J F Ward; J W Davis; C A Pettaway; C J Logothetis; L C Pagliaro
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 5.554

7.  Identification of lymphatic pathway involved in the spreading of prostate cancer by fluorescence navigation approach with intraoperatively injected indocyanine green.

Authors:  Shogo Inoue; Hiroaki Shiina; Naoko Arichi; Yozo Mitsui; Takeo Hiraoka; Koji Wake; Masahiro Sumura; Satoshi Honda; Hiroaki Yasumoto; Shinji Urakami; Akio Matsubara; Mikio Igawa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Determination of adequate pelvic lymph node dissection range for Japanese males undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Hidenori Iwai; Kei Nagase; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28

9.  [Sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. Experience after more than 800 interventions].

Authors:  D Weckermann; M Hamm; R Dorn; T Wagner; F Wawroschek; R Harzmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Intraoperative finding of gross lymph node metastasis during robot-assisted prostatectomy.

Authors:  Wooju Jeong; Shyam Sukumar; Firas Petros; Mani Menon; James O Peabody; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.