Literature DB >> 15537305

Bollgard II cotton: compositional analysis and feeding studies of cottonseed from insect-protected cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) producing the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 proteins.

Kathryn A Hamilton1, Paul D Pyla, Matthew Breeze, Tammy Olson, Menghe Li, Edwin Robinson, Sean P Gallagher, Roy Sorbet, Yin Chen.   

Abstract

Bollgard II cotton event 15985 producing the Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 proteins has been developed by genetic modification to broaden the spectrum of insects to which the plant is tolerant and to provide an insect resistance management tool to impede the onset of resistance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the composition and nutrition of Bollgard II cotton, relative to the use for food and animal feed, compared to that of conventional cotton varieties. Compositional analyses were conducted to measure proximate, fiber, amino acid, fatty acid, gossypol, and mineral contents of cottonseed from a total of 14 U.S. field sites over two years. Compositional analysis results showed that the cottonseed and cottonseed oil from Bollgard II cotton were comparable in their composition to those of the conventional control cotton line and other commercial varieties. The composition data are supported by nutritional safety studies conducted with dairy cows, catfish, and quail. Results from these studies showed that Bollgard II performed similarly to the conventional control cotton varieties. These data demonstrate that Bollgard II cotton is compositionally and nutritionally equivalent to conventional cotton varieties. These data support the conclusion that Bollgard II cotton is as safe and nutritious as conventional cotton for food and feed use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15537305     DOI: 10.1021/jf030727h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Agric Food Chem        ISSN: 0021-8561            Impact factor:   5.279


  6 in total

1.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci for oil content in cottonseed kernel.

Authors:  Quampah Alfred; Hai Ying Liu; Hai Ming Xu; Jin Rong Li; Jian Guo Wu; Shui Jin Zhu; Chun Hai Shi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 2.  Biosafety and risk assessment framework for selectable marker genes in transgenic crop plants: a case of the science not supporting the politics.

Authors:  Koreen Ramessar; Ariadna Peremarti; Sonia Gómez-Galera; Shaista Naqvi; Marian Moralejo; Pilar Muñoz; Teresa Capell; Paul Christou
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 3.145

3.  Insect-protected event DAS-81419-2 soybean (Glycine max L.) grown in the United States and Brazil is compositionally equivalent to nontransgenic soybean.

Authors:  Brandon J Fast; Ariane C Schafer; Tempest Y Johnson; Brian L Potts; Rod A Herman
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Nutritional Assessment of Dietary Bt and Cp4EPSPS Proteins on the Serum Biochemical Changes of Rabbits at Different Developmental Stages.

Authors:  Ibrahim B Salisu; Ahmad A Shahid; Qasim Ali; Abdul Q Rao; Tayyab Husnain
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2018-06-05

Review 5.  Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Feed: Is There Any Difference From Food?

Authors:  Paula A Giraldo; Hiroshi Shinozuka; German C Spangenberg; Noel O I Cogan; Kevin F Smith
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Safe composition levels of transgenic crops assessed via a clinical medicine model.

Authors:  Rod A Herman; Peter N Scherer; Amy M Phillips; Nicholas P Storer; Mark Krieger
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.