Literature DB >> 15537091

Mixotrophy in the phototrophic harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides (Dinophycean): prey species, the effects of prey concentration, and grazing impact.

Hae Jin Jeong1, Yeong Du Yoo, Jae Seong Kim, Tae Hoon Kim, Jong Hyeok Kim, Nam Seon Kang, Wonho Yih.   

Abstract

We first reported here that the harmful alga Cochlodinium polykrikoides, which had been previously known as an autotrophic dinoflagellate, was a mixotrophic species. We investigated the kinds of prey species and the effects of the prey concentration on the growth and ingestion rates of C. polykrikoides when feeding on an unidentified cryptophyte species (Equivalent Spherical Diameter, ESD = 5.6 microm). We also calculated grazing coefficients by combining field data on abundances of C. polykrikoides and co-occurring cryptophytes with laboratory data on ingestion rates obtained in the present study. Cocholdinium polykrikoides fed on prey cells by engulfing the prey through the sulcus. Among the phytoplankton prey offered, C. polykrikoides ingested small phytoplankton species that had ESD's < or = 11 microm (e.g. the prymnesiophyte Isochrysis galbana, an unidentified cryptophyte, the cryptophyte Rhodomonas salina, the raphidophyte Heterosigma akashiwo, and the dinoflagellate Amphidinium carterae). It did not feed on larger phytoplankton species that had ESD's > or = 12 microm (e.g. the dinoflagellates Heterocapsa triquetra, Prorocentrum minimum, Scrippsiella sp., Alexandrium tamarense, Prorocentrum micans, Gymnodinium catenatum, Akashiwo sanguinea, and Lingulodinium polyedrum). Specific growth rates of C. polykrikoides on a cryptophyte increased with increasing mean prey concentration, with saturation at a mean prey concentration of approximately 270 ng C ml(-1) (i.e. 15,900 cells ml(-1)). The maximum specific growth rate (mixotrophic growth) of C. polykrikoides on a cryptophyte was 0.324 d(-1), under a 14:10 h light-dark cycle of 50 microE m(-2) s(-1), while its growth rate (phototrophic growth) under the same light conditions without added prey was 0.166 d(-1). Maximum ingestion and clearance rates of C. polykrikoides on a cryptophyte were 0.16 ng C grazer(-1)d(-1) (9.4 cells grazer(-1)d(-1)) and 0.33 microl grazer(-1)h(-1), respectively. Calculated grazing coefficients by C. polykrikoides on cryptophytes were 0.001-0.745 h(-1) (i.e. 0.1-53% of cryptophyte populations were removed by a C. polykrikoides population in 1 h). The results of the present study suggest that C. polykrikoides sometimes has a considerable grazing impact on populations of cryptophytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15537091     DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2004.tb00292.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol        ISSN: 1066-5234            Impact factor:   3.346


  10 in total

1.  The globally distributed genus Alexandrium: multifaceted roles in marine ecosystems and impacts on human health.

Authors:  Donald M Anderson; Tilman J Alpermann; Allan D Cembella; Yves Collos; Estelle Masseret; Marina Montresor
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.273

2.  Molecular characterization and morphology of Cochlodinium strangulatum, the type species of Cochlodinium, and Margalefidinium gen. nov. for C. polykrikoides and allied species (Gymnodiniales, Dinophyceae).

Authors:  Fernando Gómez; Mindy L Richlen; Donald M Anderson
Journal:  Harmful Algae       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.273

3.  Mapping the Distribution of Cysts from the Toxic Dinoflagellate Cochlodinium polykrikoides in Bloom-Prone Estuaries by a Novel Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay.

Authors:  Theresa K Hattenrath-Lehmann; Yu Zhen; Ryan B Wallace; Ying-Zhong Tang; Christopher J Gobler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Assessment of microzooplankton grazing on Heterosigma akashiwo using a species-specific approach combining quantitative real-time PCR (QPCR) and dilution methods.

Authors:  Elif Demir; Kathryn J Coyne; Martina A Doblin; Sara M Handy; David A Hutchins
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Prey-dependent retention of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) by mixotrophic dinoflagellates.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Lee; Ki-Tae Park; Kitack Lee; Hae Jin Jeong; Yeong Du Yoo
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.491

6.  Prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes associated with blooms of the ichthyotoxic dinoflagellate Cochlodinium (Margalefidinium) polykrikoides in New York, USA, estuaries.

Authors:  Theresa K Hattenrath-Lehmann; Jennifer Jankowiak; Florian Koch; Christopher J Gobler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Feeding diverse prey as an excellent strategy of mixotrophic dinoflagellates for global dominance.

Authors:  Hae Jin Jeong; Hee Chang Kang; An Suk Lim; Se Hyeon Jang; Kitack Lee; Sung Yeon Lee; Jin Hee Ok; Ji Hyun You; Ji Hye Kim; Kyung Ha Lee; Sang Ah Park; Se Hee Eom; Yeong Du Yoo; Kwang Young Kim
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Hemolytic Activity in Relation to the Photosynthetic System in Chattonella marina and Chattonella ovata.

Authors:  Ni Wu; Mengmeng Tong; Siyu Gou; Weiji Zeng; Zhuoyun Xu; Tianjiu Jiang
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 5.118

9.  Effect of Nitrate, Ammonium and Urea on Growth and Pinnatoxin G Production of Vulcanodinium rugosum.

Authors:  Eric Abadie; Lamia Kaci; Tom Berteaux; Philipp Hess; Véronique Sechet; Estelle Masseret; Jean Luc Rolland; Mohamed Laabir
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  First report of Pseudobodo sp, a new pathogen for a potential energy-producing algae: Chlorella vulgaris cultures.

Authors:  Zhangran Chen; Xueqian Lei; Bangzhou Zhang; Luxi Yang; Huajun Zhang; Jingyan Zhang; Yi Li; Wei Zheng; Yun Tian; Jingwen Liu; Tianling Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.