Literature DB >> 15536654

Influence of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic characteristics of sliding and slider surfaces on friction coefficient: in vivo human skin friction comparison.

Ahmed Elkhyat1, Carol Courderot-Masuyer, Tijani Gharbi, Philippe Humbert.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to investigate whether hydrophilic/hydrophobic balance (Hi/Ho) of the skin surface strongly modifies the friction coefficient (mu). The Hi/Ho balance is determined using the relationship between the critical surface tension gammac (Zisman's principle:which delimits the wetting capacity) and the surface tension of water gammaH2O (water: reference element of Hi/Ho balance).
METHOD: Critical surface tension gammac was determined (according to Zisman's principle) through the measurement of advancing contact angle theta of a series of ethanol/water dilutions. Friction coefficient depends on several parameters: types of probe motions (rotational vs. linear), surface roughness and physicochemical parameters of surfaces in contact). In this study, the wettability parameters for six surfaces (human skin forearm, Teflon, silicone impression material 'Silflo', vinyl polysiloxane impression material 'resin' steel and glass) were measured and their influences were compared to friction coefficient mu.
RESULTS: This study shows that the higher hydrophobia tendency of the surfaces, the lower friction coefficient. The use of three sliding materials (Teflon, steel and glass) of different Hi/Ho balance confirms the importance of these physicochemical parameters in mu. For example, Teflon with high hydrophobia has a low mu. Friction coefficient increased when hydrophobia of sliding and slider surfaces decreased.
CONCLUSION: Friction coefficient value depends on the type of slider surface and its physicochemical properties. In vivo,the friction coefficient may quantify the influence of lubrificant/emolients/moisturizers. For example, the friction coefficient of hydrated skin (through the action of moisturizing products) is higher than the friction coefficient of dry skin. The relationship between the friction coefficient and the Hi/Ho balance can be reversed in the presence of water and sebum on forehead, for example.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15536654     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2004.00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skin Res Technol        ISSN: 0909-752X            Impact factor:   2.365


  6 in total

1.  Biomechanical behavior of plantar fat pad in healthy and degenerative foot conditions.

Authors:  Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Federica Nalesso; Emanuele Luigi Carniel; Arturo N Natali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Fabrication of a Micro-Needle Array Electrode by Thermal Drawing for Bio-Signals Monitoring.

Authors:  Lei Ren; Qing Jiang; Keyun Chen; Zhipeng Chen; Chengfeng Pan; Lelun Jiang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Non-stick syringe needles: Beneficial effects of thin film metallic glass coating.

Authors:  Jinn P Chu; Chia-Chi Yu; Yusuke Tanatsugu; Mikito Yasuzawa; Yu-Lin Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Chestnut Honey and Bacteriophage Application to Control Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli Biofilms: Evaluation in an ex vivo Wound Model.

Authors:  Ana Oliveira; Jéssica C Sousa; Ana C Silva; Luís D R Melo; Sanna Sillankorva
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Lotus Effect and Friction: Does Nonsticky Mean Slippery?

Authors:  Md Syam Hasan; Michael Nosonovsky
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12

6.  Insights from a Box-Behnken Optimization Study of Microemulsions with Salicylic Acid for Acne Therapy.

Authors:  Maria-Cristina Anicescu; Cristina-Elena Dinu-Pîrvu; Marina-Theodora Talianu; Mihaela Violeta Ghica; Valentina Anuța; Răzvan-Mihai Prisada; Anca Cecilia Nicoară; Lăcrămioara Popa
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.321

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.