OBJECTIVE: Normal subjects tend to bisect lines slightly to the left of the true midpoint, a phenomenon termed pseudoneglect. To test whether pseudoneglect relates to the right hemisphere's dominance for spatial attention or to the hemispheric difference in processing global-local stimulus properties, we administered conventional solid-line (SBT) and novel character-line (CBT) bisection tasks to normal subjects of different ages. METHODS: Normal subjects, consisting of 40 young and 40 older individuals, received 3 experimental tasks, a standard SBT and 2 types of CBT. Each subject completed 10 consecutive trials of each task presented in counterbalanced order between subjects. RESULTS: Across age groups, deviations on CBT were further to the right than those of SBT, and the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) was significant only in SBT. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the bisection errors in normal subjects depend on the characteristics demanded by the specific task. Thus, our findings argue against the attention dominance theory and support a "task specificity" theory for pseudoneglect.
OBJECTIVE: Normal subjects tend to bisect lines slightly to the left of the true midpoint, a phenomenon termed pseudoneglect. To test whether pseudoneglect relates to the right hemisphere's dominance for spatial attention or to the hemispheric difference in processing global-local stimulus properties, we administered conventional solid-line (SBT) and novel character-line (CBT) bisection tasks to normal subjects of different ages. METHODS: Normal subjects, consisting of 40 young and 40 older individuals, received 3 experimental tasks, a standard SBT and 2 types of CBT. Each subject completed 10 consecutive trials of each task presented in counterbalanced order between subjects. RESULTS: Across age groups, deviations on CBT were further to the right than those of SBT, and the leftward bias (pseudoneglect) was significant only in SBT. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the bisection errors in normal subjects depend on the characteristics demanded by the specific task. Thus, our findings argue against the attention dominance theory and support a "task specificity" theory for pseudoneglect.
Authors: Jong Hun Kim; Byung Hwa Lee; Seok Min Go; Sang Won Seo; Kenneth M Heilman; Duk L Na Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 4.262