Literature DB >> 15536234

Preventing overestimation of pixels in computed tomography assessment of visceral fat.

Aaron M Potretzke1, Kathryn H Schmitz, Michael D Jensen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Computed tomography (CT) is a common research procedure for measuring abdominal fat distribution, but little is written about the software used to analyze images. Our objective was to compare in-house and commercially available software for quantitative measurement of abdominal fat distribution. In the process, we encountered some unexpected problems. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A total of 123 volunteers had single-slice abdominal CT images taken that were used to evaluate various aspects of the commercial image analysis program.
RESULTS: The agreement between the commercial and in-house programs was excellent (r = 0.996, p < 0.00,001) for both total and intraabdominal fat, and we were able to reduce between-observer variability in measured fat areas through the use of statistical handling of region of interest information. We also noted that intracolonic contents sometimes had the same Hounsfield units as adipose tissue. We analyzed single-slice CT images from 50 volunteers to determine the potential impact of this effect on visceral fat area; the overestimate of visceral fat area was 19 +/- 22% (maximum, 112% overestimate). The commercial program could prevent this error, whereas our in-house program could not. DISCUSSION: We concluded that a readily available commercial image analysis program compares well with a previously validated in-house program and that it offers some advantages with respect to preventing overestimation of pixels as visceral fat.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15536234     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2004.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Res        ISSN: 1071-7323


  18 in total

1.  Comparison of 3 T MRI and CT for the measurement of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans.

Authors:  B J Klopfenstein; M S Kim; C M Krisky; J Szumowski; W D Rooney; J Q Purnell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Renal sinus fat and poor blood pressure control in middle-aged and elderly individuals at risk for cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Haroon L Chughtai; Timothy M Morgan; Michael Rocco; Brandon Stacey; Tina E Brinkley; Jingzhong Ding; Barbara Nicklas; Craig Hamilton; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Intra-abdominal fat and elevated urine albumin excretion in men with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Shalamar D Sibley; Ian H de Boer; Michael W Steffes; John D Brunzell
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Persistent apparent pancreatic β-cell defects in premenarchal PCOS relatives.

Authors:  Laura C Torchen; Naomi R Fogel; Wendy J Brickman; Rodis Paparodis; Andrea Dunaif
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Lower adiponectin is associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease among HIV-infected men.

Authors:  Kerunne S Ketlogetswe; Wendy S Post; Xiuhong Li; Frank J Palella; Lisa P Jacobson; Joseph B Margolick; Lawrence A Kingsley; Mallory D Witt; Adrian S Dobs; Matthew J Budoff; Todd T Brown
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Deep Learning-based Quantification of Abdominal Subcutaneous and Visceral Fat Volume on CT Images.

Authors:  Andrew T Grainger; Arun Krishnaraj; Michael H Quinones; Nicholas J Tustison; Samantha Epstein; Daniela Fuller; Aakash Jha; Kevin L Allman; Weibin Shi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Validity of a new automated software program for visceral adipose tissue estimation.

Authors:  E W Demerath; K J Ritter; W A Couch; N L Rogers; G M Moreno; A Choh; M Lee; K Remsberg; S A Czerwinski; W C Chumlea; R M Siervogel; B Towne
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 5.095

8.  Does vertebral bone marrow fat content correlate with abdominal adipose tissue, lumbar spine bone mineral density, and blood biomarkers in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus?

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Samuel P Yap; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Lorenzo Nardo; Daniel Kuo; Andrew J Burghardt; Umesh B Masharani; Ann V Schwartz; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Short-term regional meal fat storage in nonobese humans is not a predictor of long-term regional fat gain.

Authors:  Susanne B Votruba; Michael D Jensen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 4.310

10.  Experimental Weight Gain Increases Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Healthy Subjects: Implications of Visceral Fat Accumulation.

Authors:  Naima Covassin; Fatima H Sert-Kuniyoshi; Prachi Singh; Abel Romero-Corral; Diane E Davison; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Michael D Jensen; Virend K Somers
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.