Basil Künnecke1, Philippe Verry, Agnès Bénardeau, Markus von Kienlin. 1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy, PRBD-M, Building 68/05A, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Grenzacherstrasse 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland. basil.kuennecke@roche.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry has recently been introduced for noninvasive body composition analysis in awake mice. The purpose of the present study was to extend the method to rats and to introduce calibration procedures that render MR relaxometry fully quantitative. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Proton T(2) MR relaxometry at 4.7 Tesla was used for body composition analyses in 700 awake mice and 400 rats of different strains and conditions. Relaxograms calculated from the signal decays observed with multi-spin-echo acquisition provided well-separated contributions of tissue water and fat. Analysis of fat composition was carried out in vivo using (13)C-MR spectroscopy. Evolution of body composition in rats was assessed during drug treatment. RESULTS: MR relaxometry for noninvasive body composition analysis in laboratory rodents was implemented on a standard MR scanner, and a throughput of >30 animals per hour was achieved. Excellent linearity and reproducibility with coefficients of variance as low as 2.5% and 1.7% were obtained in mice and rats, respectively. The lean mass-to-water ratio (mice, 1.35 +/- 0.03; rats, 1.39 +/- 0.04) and the proton density of fat (mice, 8.1 +/- 0.2; rats, 8.9 +/- 0.2 g/mol) were determined from cross-sectional data. Fat composition analysis by (13)C-MR spectroscopy corroborated these findings and yielded information on the average acyl chain length (16.3 +/- 1.6) and contributions of saturated (27 +/- 3%), monounsaturated (22 +/- 2%), and polyunsaturated (51 +/- 3%) fatty acids. Longitudinal assessments in rats treated with sibutramine and dexfenfluramine showed dose-related changes in body composition. DISCUSSION: T(2) MR relaxometry backed by solid calibration provides a powerful means for rapid quantitative body composition analysis in awake mice and rats that is suitable for serial investigations in pharmaceutical research.
OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry has recently been introduced for noninvasive body composition analysis in awake mice. The purpose of the present study was to extend the method to rats and to introduce calibration procedures that render MR relaxometry fully quantitative. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Proton T(2) MR relaxometry at 4.7 Tesla was used for body composition analyses in 700 awake mice and 400 rats of different strains and conditions. Relaxograms calculated from the signal decays observed with multi-spin-echo acquisition provided well-separated contributions of tissue water and fat. Analysis of fat composition was carried out in vivo using (13)C-MR spectroscopy. Evolution of body composition in rats was assessed during drug treatment. RESULTS: MR relaxometry for noninvasive body composition analysis in laboratory rodents was implemented on a standard MR scanner, and a throughput of >30 animals per hour was achieved. Excellent linearity and reproducibility with coefficients of variance as low as 2.5% and 1.7% were obtained in mice and rats, respectively. The lean mass-to-water ratio (mice, 1.35 +/- 0.03; rats, 1.39 +/- 0.04) and the proton density of fat (mice, 8.1 +/- 0.2; rats, 8.9 +/- 0.2 g/mol) were determined from cross-sectional data. Fat composition analysis by (13)C-MR spectroscopy corroborated these findings and yielded information on the average acyl chain length (16.3 +/- 1.6) and contributions of saturated (27 +/- 3%), monounsaturated (22 +/- 2%), and polyunsaturated (51 +/- 3%) fatty acids. Longitudinal assessments in rats treated with sibutramine and dexfenfluramine showed dose-related changes in body composition. DISCUSSION: T(2) MR relaxometry backed by solid calibration provides a powerful means for rapid quantitative body composition analysis in awake mice and rats that is suitable for serial investigations in pharmaceutical research.
Authors: Andrew C Shin; Huiyuan Zheng; R Leigh Townsend; David L Sigalet; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2010-02-23 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Eugene N Bush; Robin Shapiro; Michael E Brune; Victoria E Knourek-Segel; Brian A Droz; Thomas Fey; Emily Lin; Peer B Jacobson Journal: Endocrine Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Tanusree Sen; Carolina R Cawthon; Benjamin Thomas Ihde; Andras Hajnal; Patricia M DiLorenzo; Claire B de La Serre; Krzysztof Czaja Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2017-02-27
Authors: Jianping Ye; Zheng Hao; Michael B Mumphrey; R Leigh Townsend; Laurel M Patterson; Nicholas Stylopoulos; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison; Daniel J Drucker; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Joshua P Nixon; Minzhi Zhang; ChuanFeng Wang; Michael A Kuskowski; Colleen M Novak; James A Levine; Charles J Billington; Catherine M Kotz Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Marcia L E MacDonald; Roshni R Singaraja; Nagat Bissada; Piers Ruddle; Russell Watts; Joanna M Karasinska; William T Gibson; Catherine Fievet; Jean E Vance; Bart Staels; Michael R Hayden Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2007-10-24 Impact factor: 5.922