Literature DB >> 1553582

The traction angle and cervical intervertebral separation.

A M Wong1, C P Leong, C M Chen.   

Abstract

Seventeen normal young adults were evaluated for cervical intervertebral separation under different traction angles through motorized intermittent traction in the supine position. In all cases, the anterior and posterior intervertebral spaces were increased by traction at neutral position and in 30 degrees flexion, but not in 15 degrees extension. The effects of separation were 1) neutral position: anterior intervertebral separation C4-5 (12%) greater than C3-4 (8%), posterior intervertebral separation C6-7 (37%) greater than C3-4 (22%) greater than C4-5 (19%); and 2) 30 degrees flexion: anterior intervertebral separation C2-3 (21%) greater than C4-5 (16%) greater than C5-6 (15%) greater than C3-4 (10%), posterior intervertebral separation C6-7 (20%) greater than C5-6 (19%) greater than C4-5 (17%). There was a significant decrease in intervertebral separation posteriorly in extension traction, especially at C6-7 (-50%), C5-6 (-37%), C4-5 (-26%), and C3-4 (-14%). The separation of facet joint surfaces was found after traction at 15 degrees extension, but not in the neutral or flexion positions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1553582     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199202000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of the intervertebral disc spaces between axial and anterior lean cervical traction.

Authors:  Chin-Teng Chung; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chun-Jung Chen; Ting-Chung Wu; David Wang; Haw-Chang H Lan; Shyi-Kuen Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical disc degeneration: important considerations for the manual therapist.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Douglas Creighton
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  M R Gudavalli; T Potluri; G Carandang; R M Havey; L I Voronov; J M Cox; R M Rowell; R A Kruse; G C Joachim; A G Patwardhan; C N R Henderson; C Goertz
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  Effect of an intensive cervical traction protocol on mid-term disability and pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy: An exploratory, prospective, observational pilot study.

Authors:  Thomas Rulleau; Sophie Abeille; Lydie Pastor; Lucie Planche; Pascale Allary; Catherine Chapeleau; Chloé Moreau; Grégoire Cormier; Michel Caulier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Changes in cervical muscle activity according to the traction force of an air-inflatable neck traction device.

Authors:  Jong Ho Kang; Tae-Sung Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  The efficacy of a home-mechanical traction unit for patients with mild to moderate cervical osteoarthrosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Batoul Bagheripour; Mojtaba Kamyab; Fatemeh Azadinia; Ali Amiri; Mohammad Akbari
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2016-06-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.