Literature DB >> 15534415

A new clinical evaluation for hysterical paralysis.

Itaru Yugué1, Keiichiro Shiba, Takayoshi Ueta, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was performed to elucidate the usefulness of a new clinical evaluation, and a prospective study was performed to detect hysterical paralysis using this evaluation method.
OBJECTIVES: To make a correct diagnosis of hysterical paralysis, a new clinical evaluation was developed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Hysterical paralysis is a conversion disorder. Its diagnosis must be ruled out when encountering a patient with paralysis, therefore imaging and electrophysiological studies are often necessary, but costly. The principal salient diagnostic features for diagnosing hysterical paralysis are thought to be the preservation of a normal reflex pattern, normal rectal sensation, and normal bladder and bowel functions; however, these features are not always successfully identified.
METHODS: A new clinical evaluation named the "Spinal Injuries Center" test was developed. The lower extremities of the patients were divided into two groups as follows: in group A, the patients were able to lift up the knee; in group B, the patients were unable to lift up the knee. The 96 legs of the 48 patients who had obvious myelomalacia were randomly chosen. All legs were investigated using the Spinal Injuries Center test, and the association between each group and the Spinal Injuries Center test was examined. The 28 legs of the 14 patients in whom hysterical paralysis was diagnosed were prospectively evaluated using the Spinal Injuries Center test, and the association between the groups and the Spinal Injuries Center test was examined.
RESULTS: Forty-eight legs were classified as group A, and 48 legs were classified as group B. In group A, 45 legs were judged to be positive for the Spinal Injuries Center test, and 3 legs were negative. In group B, 1 leg was judged to be positive for the Spinal Injuries Center test, and 47 legs were negative. All legs of the patients with hysterical paralysis were classified as group B; however, all legs were positive for the Spinal Injuries Center test.
CONCLUSIONS: The Spinal Injuries Center test is a new clinical evaluation method that can help make a correct diagnosis of hysterical paralysis. When a patient is unable to lift up his knees by himself, the result of the Spinal Injuries Center test is considered to be positive, and hysterical paralysis is diagnosed in such patients. The diagnosis of hysterical paralysis must be ruled out when encountering patients with paralysis, and as a result, imaging and electrophysiological studies are often necessary. Unfortunately, such tests are costly. Thus, a new clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of hysterical paralysis, named the Spinal Injuries Center test, was developed. When patients who are unable to lift up their knees by themselves test positive using the Spinal Injuries Center test, then they are considered to have ether hysterical or simulated paralysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534415     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137055.55350.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  11 in total

1.  Hysterical paralysis after spinal surgery.

Authors:  Liang Zhu; Bin Ni; Qunfeng Guo
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Spurious neurological signs and symptoms in children.

Authors:  Joseph M Dooley; Kevin E Gordon
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.253

4.  Acute onset of tetraparesis, arreflexia and respiratory distress in an otherwise healthy male.

Authors:  Mitchell Hamele; Cristin A Mount
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-12-20

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of the 'knee-up test' for estimation of the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale in patients with acute motor incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Itaru Yugué; Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Evaluation of neurologic deficit without apparent cause: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Harvey E Smith; Ralph E Rynning; Chukwuka Okafor; James Zaslavsky; Joseph I Tracy; John Ratliff; James Harrop; Todd Albert; Alan Hilibrand; Gregory Anderson; Ashwini Sharan; Zoe Brown; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  Hysterical paralysis.

Authors:  Ciğdem Atan; Umit Seçkin; Hatice Bodur
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Paradoxical wrist flexion: A new test to detect functional weakness of the upper limb.

Authors:  Masahiro Sonoo
Journal:  eNeurologicalSci       Date:  2020-12-04

9.  Conversion Paralysis After Cervical Surgery: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Miao Fang; Jiaojiao Zhou; Yong Zeng; Shishu Huang; Yueming Song
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

10.  Dissociative paraplegia after epidural anesthesia: a case report.

Authors:  Dusan Hirjak; Philipp A Thomann; Robert C Wolf; Norbert Weidner; Einar P Wilder-Smith
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.