Literature DB >> 15534105

Prognostic value of ERM gene expression in human primary breast cancers.

Anne Chotteau-Lelièvre1, Françoise Révillion, Valérie Lhotellier, Louis Hornez, Xavier Desbiens, Véronique Cabaret, Yvan de Launoit, Jean-Philippe Peyrat.   

Abstract

We measured the expression of ERM gene, a nuclear transcription factor belonging to the ets family, in a series of 364 unselected primary breast cancers from patients who underwent locoregional surgery in the Centre Oscar Lambret between May 1989 and December 1991. The expression of ERM was quantified with a real-time one-step reverse transcription-PCR assay based on the 5'-nuclease activity of the TaqDNA polymerase and with an Abi Prism 7700 Sequence Detector System (Applied Biosystems, Courtaboeuf, France). ERM was positively correlated (Spearman test) to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR; P < 0.001, r = 0.296) and to histoprognostic grading (P = 0.044, r = 0.112), whereas it was negatively correlated to estradiol receptors (P = 0.019, r = -0.124), HER3 (c-erbB-3; P = 0.01, r = -0.135), and HER4 (c-erbB-4; P = 0.003, r = -0.154). Using the chi2 test, a positive relationship was found between the expression of ERM and EGFR (chi2 = 7.795, P = 0.007). In overall survival studies, Cox univariate analyses demonstrated a prognostic value of ERM (P = 0.006; risk ratio, 2.95) besides the classical prognostic factors histoprognostic grading, node involvement, tumor size, estradiol receptors, progesterone receptors, EGFR, HER3, and HER4. In multivariate analyses, ERM preserved its prognostic value (P = 0.004; risk ratio, 3.779) together with histoprognostic grading, tumor size, estradiol receptors, and progesterone receptors. In relapse-free survival studies, univariate analyses demonstrated that histoprognostic grading, node involvement, tumor size, and HER4 were prognostic factors. These parameters, except histoprognostic grading, retained their prognostic value in multivariate analyses. This study demonstrates for the first time that ERM gene expression is an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival in breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15534105     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  ERM/ETV5 and RUNX1/AML1 expression in endometrioid adenocarcinomas of endometrium and association with neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Vanessa Paiva Leite de Sousa; Claudia Bessa Pereira Chaves; Janina Ferreira Loureiro Huguenin; Fábio Carvalho de Barros Moreira; Bruno Souza Bianchi de Reis; Leila Chimelli; Anke Bergmann; Tatiana de Almeida Simão; Luis Felipe Ribeiro Pinto
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  The ETS family of oncogenic transcription factors in solid tumours.

Authors:  Gina M Sizemore; Jason R Pitarresi; Subhasree Balakrishnan; Michael C Ostrowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  ETV1, 4 and 5: an oncogenic subfamily of ETS transcription factors.

Authors:  Sangphil Oh; Sook Shin; Ralf Janknecht
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-03-08

4.  Capicua restricts cancer stem cell-like properties in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Jeehyun Yoe; Donghyo Kim; Sanguk Kim; Yoontae Lee
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 9.867

5.  The role of Pea3 group transcription factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hiu-Fung Yuen; Cian M McCrudden; Ka-Kui Chan; Yuen-Piu Chan; Michelle Lok-Yee Wong; Kelvin Yuen-Kwong Chan; Ui-Soon Khoo; Simon Law; Gopesh Srivastava; Terence R Lappin; Kwok-Wah Chan; Mohamed El-Tanani
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Tamoxifen downregulates ets oncogene family members ETV4 and ETV5 in benign breast tissue: implications for durable risk reduction.

Authors:  David Euhus; Dawei Bu; Xian-Jin Xie; Venetia Sarode; Raheela Ashfaq; Kelly Hunt; Weiya Xia; Joyce O'Shaughnessy; Michael Grant; Banu Arun; William Dooley; Alexander Miller; David Flockhart; Cheryl Lewis
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-07-21

7.  Expression of 5-lipoxygenase in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Labile Togba Soumaoro; Satoru Iida; Hiroyuki Uetake; Megumi Ishiguro; Yoko Takagi; Tetsuro Higuchi; Masamichi Yasuno; Masayuki Enomoto; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Gdnf signaling pathways within the mammalian spermatogonial stem cell niche.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Hofmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 4.102

9.  Increased expression of NuSAP in recurrent prostate cancer is mediated by E2F1.

Authors:  Z G Gulzar; J K McKenney; J D Brooks
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  FLI1 expression is correlated with breast cancer cellular growth, migration, and invasion and altered gene expression.

Authors:  Melissa N Scheiber; Patricia M Watson; Tihana Rumboldt; Connor Stanley; Robert C Wilson; Victoria J Findlay; Paul E Anderson; Dennis K Watson
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.