UNLABELLED: Differentiation between posttherapy radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor in humans with brain tumor is still a difficult diagnostic task. The new PET tracers (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and (18)F-fluorocholine (N,N-dimethyl-N-(18)F-fluoromethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium [FCH]) have shown promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. This study assessed uptake of these tracers in experimental radiation injury. METHODS: In a first model, circumscribed lesions were induced in the cortex of 35 rats using proton irradiation of 150 or 250 Gy. After radiation injury developed, uptake of (18)F-FET, (18)F-FCH, and (18)F-FDG was measured using autoradiography and correlated with histology and disruption of the blood-brain barrier as determined with Evans blue. In a second model, uptake of the tracers was assessed in acute cryolesions, which are characterized by the absence of inflammatory cells. RESULTS: Mean (18)F-FET, (18)F-FCH, and (18)F-FDG standardized uptake values in the most active part of the radiation lesion and the contralateral normal cortex (in parentheses) were 2.27 +/- 0.46 (1.42 +/- 0.23), 2.52 +/- 0.42 (0.61 +/- 0.12), and 6.21 +/- 1.19 (4.35 +/- 0.47). The degree of uptake of (18)F-FCH and (18)F-FDG correlated with the density of macrophages. In cryolesions, (18)F-FET uptake was similar to that in radiation lesions, and (18)F-FCH uptake was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Comparison of tracer accumulation in cryolesions and radiation injuries demonstrates that (18)F-FET uptake is most likely due to a disruption of the blood-brain barrier alone, whereas (18)F-FCH is additionally trapped by macrophages. Uptake of both tracers in the radiation injuries is generally lower than the published uptake in tumors, suggesting that (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH are promising tracers for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence. However, the comparability of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as different species and acquisition protocols and modalities. Thus, more studies are needed to settle this issue. Nevertheless, (18)F-FCH and (18)F-FET seem superior to (18)F-FDG for this purpose.
UNLABELLED: Differentiation between posttherapy radiation necrosis and recurrent tumor in humans with brain tumor is still a difficult diagnostic task. The new PET tracers (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-l-tyrosine (FET) and (18)F-fluorocholine (N,N-dimethyl-N-(18)F-fluoromethyl-2-hydroxyethylammonium [FCH]) have shown promise for improving diagnostic accuracy. This study assessed uptake of these tracers in experimental radiation injury. METHODS: In a first model, circumscribed lesions were induced in the cortex of 35 rats using proton irradiation of 150 or 250 Gy. After radiation injury developed, uptake of (18)F-FET, (18)F-FCH, and (18)F-FDG was measured using autoradiography and correlated with histology and disruption of the blood-brain barrier as determined with Evans blue. In a second model, uptake of the tracers was assessed in acute cryolesions, which are characterized by the absence of inflammatory cells. RESULTS: Mean (18)F-FET, (18)F-FCH, and (18)F-FDG standardized uptake values in the most active part of the radiation lesion and the contralateral normal cortex (in parentheses) were 2.27 +/- 0.46 (1.42 +/- 0.23), 2.52 +/- 0.42 (0.61 +/- 0.12), and 6.21 +/- 1.19 (4.35 +/- 0.47). The degree of uptake of (18)F-FCH and (18)F-FDG correlated with the density of macrophages. In cryolesions, (18)F-FET uptake was similar to that in radiation lesions, and (18)F-FCH uptake was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION: Comparison of tracer accumulation in cryolesions and radiation injuries demonstrates that (18)F-FET uptake is most likely due to a disruption of the blood-brain barrier alone, whereas (18)F-FCH is additionally trapped by macrophages. Uptake of both tracers in the radiation injuries is generally lower than the published uptake in tumors, suggesting that (18)F-FET and (18)F-FCH are promising tracers for separating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence. However, the comparability of our data with the literature is limited by factors such as different species and acquisition protocols and modalities. Thus, more studies are needed to settle this issue. Nevertheless, (18)F-FCH and (18)F-FET seem superior to (18)F-FDG for this purpose.
Authors: Johannes Schwarzenberg; Johannes Czernin; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson; Whitney B Pope; Tristan Grogan; David Elashoff; Cheri Geist; Daniel H S Silverman; Michael E Phelps; Wei Chen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Giuliano Mariani; Laura Bruselli; Torsten Kuwert; Edmund E Kim; Albert Flotats; Ora Israel; Maurizio Dondi; Naoyuki Watanabe Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Carina Stegmayr; Ulrike Bandelow; Dennis Oliveira; Philipp Lohmann; Antje Willuweit; Christian Filss; Norbert Galldiks; Joachim H R Lübke; N Jon Shah; Johannes Ermert; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 9.236