Literature DB >> 15533564

Safety of electronic molecular resonance adenoidectomy.

V Tarantino1, R D'Agostino, A Melagrana, A Porcu, M Stura, R Vallarino, M G Calevo.   

Abstract

Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequent operations in children. In order to reduce hospital stay costs, today, this procedure is performed as day surgery. Even though adenoidectomy is not considered risky, some minor complications may occur, the most important being bleeding (0.5-8% incidence). The surgical technique used can influence considerably postoperative pain and time to recovery. This aspect is essential in the management of day surgery patients, for whom the need of safe and rapid maneuvers associated with early recovery determines the choice of the surgical procedure. Recently, we developed a surgical technique based on the use of an electronic molecular resonance tool associated with bendable suction electrocautery. This study was carried out on 600 patients, divided into two groups, the first undergoing ablation using the molecular resonance tool and the second undergoing curette adenoidectomy. The two groups were homogeneous for age, sex, surgical indications, and grade of adenoid hypertrophy. The following parameters were considered: duration of surgery, importance of intraoperative bleeding, time to cicatrization, incidence of bleeding complications. Duration of surgery and intra- and postoperative bleeding were much lower in the first group than in the group undergoing traditional adenoidectomy. In addition, rhinopharyngeal complete cicatrization, defined as absolute absence of pseudomembrane, was much quicker in the first group, as assessed by postoperative endoscopy. Another major advantage offered by the molecular resonance tool is the accuracy of surgery performed under visual control in a practically bloodless field. To sum up, this method, thanks to its technical features and safety, is particularly indicated in children and in patients with coagulation disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533564     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  4 in total

1.  Endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider.

Authors:  S S Somani; C S Naik; S V Bangad
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-11

2.  [S1 Clinical guideline"adenoids and adenoidectomy"].

Authors:  T Wilhelm; G Hilger; K Begall; J Lautermann; O Kaschke; P Mir-Salim; T Zahnert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Safety Parameters of Quantum Molecular Resonance Devices During Thyroid Surgery: Porcine Model Using Continuous Neuromonitoring.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Tseng; Tzu-Yen Huang; Yi-Chu Lin; Jia Joanna Wang; How-Yun Ko; Cheng-Hsun Chuang; I-Cheng Lu; Pi-Ying Chang; Gregory W Randolph; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Ning-Chia Chang; Che-Wei Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Endoscopic assisted adenoidectomy versus conventional curettage adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liyun Yang; Yamin Shan; Shili Wang; Changping Cai; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-04-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.