Literature DB >> 15533445

Protein-protein interactions: hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: implications for docking.

Xiang Li1, Ozlem Keskin, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov, Jie Liang.   

Abstract

Energetic hot spots account for a significant portion of the total binding free energy and correlate with structurally conserved interface residues. Here, we map experimentally determined hot spots and structurally conserved residues to investigate their geometrical organization. Unfilled pockets are pockets that remain unfilled after protein-protein complexation, while complemented pockets are pockets that disappear upon binding, representing tightly fit regions. We find that structurally conserved residues and energetic hot spots are strongly favored to be located in complemented pockets, and are disfavored in unfilled pockets. For the three available protein-protein complexes with complemented pockets where both members of the complex were alanine-scanned, 62% of all hot spots (DeltaDeltaG>2kcal/mol) are within these pockets, and 60% of the residues in the complemented pockets are hot spots. 93% of all red-hot residues (DeltaDeltaG>/=4kcal/mol) either protrude into or are located in complemented pockets. The occurrence of hot spots and conserved residues in complemented pockets highlights the role of local tight packing in protein associations, and rationalizes their energetic contribution and conservation. Complemented pockets and their corresponding protruding residues emerge among the most important geometric features in protein-protein interactions. By screening the solvent, this organization shields backbone hydrogen bonds and charge-charge interactions. Complemented pockets often pre-exist binding. For 18 protein-protein complexes with complemented pockets whose unbound structures are available, in 16 the pockets are identified to pre-exist in the unbound structures. The root-mean-squared deviations of the atoms lining the pockets between the bound and unbound states is as small as 0.9A, suggesting that such pockets constitute features of the populated native state that may be used in docking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  64 in total

Review 1.  Tools used to study how protein complexes are assembled in signaling cascades.

Authors:  Susan Dwane; Patrick A Kiely
Journal:  Bioeng Bugs       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Protein subunit interfaces: A statistical analysis of hot spots in Sm proteins.

Authors:  Srđan D Stojanović; Božidarka L Zarić; Snežana D Zarić
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Sequence composition and environment effects on residue fluctuations in protein structures.

Authors:  Anatoly M Ruvinsky; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Relationship between hot spot residues and ligand binding hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.

Authors:  Brandon S Zerbe; David R Hall; Sandor Vajda; Adrian Whitty; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Association of putative concave protein-binding sites with the fluctuation behavior of residues.

Authors:  Asli Ertekin; Ruth Nussinov; Turkan Haliloglu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Computational prediction of protein hot spot residues.

Authors:  John Kenneth Morrow; Shuxing Zhang
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.116

7.  Restricted mobility of conserved residues in protein-protein interfaces in molecular simulations.

Authors:  Osman N Yogurtcu; S Bora Erdemli; Ruth Nussinov; Metin Turkay; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces.

Authors:  Nurcan Tuncbag; Gozde Kar; Ozlem Keskin; Attila Gursoy; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin.

Authors:  Tomasz Wlodarski; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Modeling of both shared and distinct interactions between MIF and its homologue D-DT with their common receptor CD74.

Authors:  Roberto Meza-Romero; Gil Benedek; Kelley Jordan; Lin Leng; Georgios Pantouris; Elias Lolis; Richard Bucala; Arthur A Vandenbark
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 3.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.