Literature DB >> 15533342

Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women.

Evan R Myers1, Susan Silva, Kurt Barnhart, Pamela A Groben, Mary S Richardson, Stanley J Robboy, Phyllis Leppert, Christos Coutifaris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of biopsy timing and fertility status on inter- and intraobserver variability in dating of the endometrium.
DESIGN: Endometrial biopsy slides randomly selected from a multicenter study testing the utility of biopsy in the diagnosis of infertility were distributed to three gynecologic pathologists, who estimated cycle day using standard criteria. Readers were blinded to the purpose of the study, patient age, fertility status, or timing of biopsy relative to LH surge or next menses.
SETTING: Multicenter academic research programs in reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Eighty-two women with proven fertility, 83 infertile patients. INTERVENTION(S): Endometrial biopsy during midluteal (days 21-22) or late (days 26-27) luteal phase. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), kappa. RESULT(S): Overall agreement was excellent (ICC 0.88); addition of readings by local pathologists decreased ICC only slightly. In subgroup analyses, ICCs were lowest for infertile women during the midluteal phase (0.65 vs. 0.71 for fertile women in the midluteal phase, and 0.88-0.90 for both groups in the late luteal phase). Intraobserver reliability was excellent (0.9-0.99). Agreement for diagnoses of "out-of-phase" was only moderate, with kappa values between 0.4 and 0.6. CONCLUSION(S): Observer variability in dating the endometrium was greatest in infertile women during the window of implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533342     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

Review 1.  Implantation failure: molecular mechanisms and clinical treatment.

Authors:  Hakan Cakmak; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 15.610

2.  Local privileges not universal rights: geographic variations in the science and clinical practice of reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Alexander M Quaas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Gene expression during successful implantation in a natural cycle.

Authors:  Inge Van Vaerenbergh; Ramsey McIntire; Leentje Van Lommel; Paul Devroey; Linda Giudice; Claire Bourgain
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Proteomic analysis of the luteal endometrial secretome.

Authors:  Jessica G Scotchie; Marc A Fritz; Mihaela Mocanu; Bruce A Lessey; Steven L Young
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.060

5.  Interobserver agreement for endometrial cancer characteristics evaluated on biopsy material.

Authors:  S Nofech-Mozes; N Ismiil; V Dubé; R S Saad; Z Ghorab; A Grin; I Ackerman; M A Khalifa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.