F Rivera-Hidalgo1, J D Shulman, M M Beach. 1. Department of Periodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX 75246, USA. Frivera-hidalgo@tambcd.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine point and annual prevalence of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). SETTING: Reported prevalence of RAS in textbooks and much of the literature varies according to study location, patient selection and whether point prevalence (presence of lesions at examination) or period prevalence (history of lesions during a specified period) is reported. Many studies are based on non-probability samples and this may contribute to significant variation in reported prevalence and factors presumed to be associated with RAS. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, a large United States probability sample, for RAS and covariates suggested in the literature using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Oral mucosal examinations were performed on 17 235 adults 17 years and older. Of these, 146 (0.89%) had at least one clinically apparent aphthous lesion. For annual (reported) prevalence, Whites (20.87%) and Mexican-Americans (12.88%) had several fold higher prevalence of RAS than Blacks (4.96%). Adults younger than 40 years of age had almost twice the prevalence (22.54%) of those older than 40 years (13.42%). CONCLUSION: Annual prevalence was significantly higher in whites and Mexican-Americans (compared with blacks), individuals 17-39 years of age, cigarette non-smokers, and those with recurrent herpes labialis history; while it was lower in males. Point prevalence was significantly higher in whites, Mexican-American, individuals 17-39 years of age, cigarette non-smokers, and males.
OBJECTIVE: To determine point and annual prevalence of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS). SETTING: Reported prevalence of RAS in textbooks and much of the literature varies according to study location, patient selection and whether point prevalence (presence of lesions at examination) or period prevalence (history of lesions during a specified period) is reported. Many studies are based on non-probability samples and this may contribute to significant variation in reported prevalence and factors presumed to be associated with RAS. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, a large United States probability sample, for RAS and covariates suggested in the literature using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Oral mucosal examinations were performed on 17 235 adults 17 years and older. Of these, 146 (0.89%) had at least one clinically apparent aphthous lesion. For annual (reported) prevalence, Whites (20.87%) and Mexican-Americans (12.88%) had several fold higher prevalence of RAS than Blacks (4.96%). Adults younger than 40 years of age had almost twice the prevalence (22.54%) of those older than 40 years (13.42%). CONCLUSION: Annual prevalence was significantly higher in whites and Mexican-Americans (compared with blacks), individuals 17-39 years of age, cigarette non-smokers, and those with recurrent herpes labialis history; while it was lower in males. Point prevalence was significantly higher in whites, Mexican-American, individuals 17-39 years of age, cigarette non-smokers, and males.
Authors: Andreas Altenburg; Nadine El-Haj; Christiana Micheli; Marion Puttkammer; Mohammed Badawy Abdel-Naser; Christos C Zouboulis Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Parvathi Devi M K; Ramesh D N S V; Shrinivas Koppal; Amit R Byatnal; Thriveni Rukmangada; Aditi A Byatnal Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2014-11-20