Literature DB >> 1553170

Functional ovarian cysts in relation to the use of monophasic and triphasic oral contraceptives.

V L Holt1, J R Daling, B McKnight, D Moore, A Stergachis, N S Weiss.   

Abstract

This population-based case-control study assessed the effect of current use of monophasic or triphasic oral contraceptives (OCs) on the risk of functional ovarian cyst development. The cases were all 15-39-year-old enrollees in the Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound who had either an inpatient primary diagnosis of functional ovarian cyst in 1988 or 1989 (N = 67) or an outpatient primary diagnosis of functional ovarian cyst from March 1988 through August 1989 at one of five Group Health Cooperative primary care clinics (N = 39). Controls were randomly selected enrollees matched to the cases for age, primary care clinic, and enrollment date (N = 255). Subjects with previous hysterectomy or oophorectomy were excluded from this analysis. Pharmacy and medical record review showed that 16% of cases and 19% of controls were currently using monophasic OCs, whereas 11% of cases and 9% of controls were using triphasic OCs. Compared with women not using hormonal contraception, the relative risks of a diagnosed functional ovarian cyst among women currently using OCs were 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-1.8) for users of monophasic OCs and 1.3 (95% CI 0.5-3.3) for users of triphasic OCs. In contrast to previous studies of monophasic OCs containing higher steroid dosages, the results of this study suggest that current use of low-dose monophasic OCs does not substantially decrease a woman's risk of functional ovarian cyst formation. In addition, our results do not support recent speculation that current use of triphasic OCs appreciably increases the risk of functional ovarian cysts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1553170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  Combined hormonal contraceptives: prescribing patterns, compliance, and benefits versus risks.

Authors:  Jan Brynhildsen
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-10

Review 2.  Noncontraceptive health benefits of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Kavita Nanda; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 4.  Ovarian follicular development during the use of oral contraception: a review.

Authors:  Angela R Baerwald; Roger A Pierson
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2004-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.