Literature DB >> 15531651

Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack.

Adrian L R Thomas1, Graham K Taylor, Robert B Srygley, Robert L Nudds, Richard J Bomphrey.   

Abstract

Here we show, by qualitative free- and tethered-flight flow visualization, that dragonflies fly by using unsteady aerodynamic mechanisms to generate high-lift, leading-edge vortices. In normal free flight, dragonflies use counterstroking kinematics, with a leading-edge vortex (LEV) on the forewing downstroke, attached flow on the forewing upstroke, and attached flow on the hindwing throughout. Accelerating dragonflies switch to in-phase wing-beats with highly separated downstroke flows, with a single LEV attached across both the fore- and hindwings. We use smoke visualizations to distinguish between the three simplest local analytical solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations yielding flow separation resulting in a LEV. The LEV is an open U-shaped separation, continuous across the thorax, running parallel to the wing leading edge and inflecting at the tips to form wingtip vortices. Air spirals in to a free-slip critical point over the centreline as the LEV grows. Spanwise flow is not a dominant feature of the flow field--spanwise flows sometimes run from wingtip to centreline, or vice versa--depending on the degree of sideslip. LEV formation always coincides with rapid increases in angle of attack, and the smoke visualizations clearly show the formation of LEVs whenever a rapid increase in angle of attack occurs. There is no discrete starting vortex. Instead, a shear layer forms behind the trailing edge whenever the wing is at a non-zero angle of attack, and rolls up, under Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, into a series of transverse vortices with circulation of opposite sign to the circulation around the wing and LEV. The flow fields produced by dragonflies differ qualitatively from those published for mechanical models of dragonflies, fruitflies and hawkmoths, which preclude natural wing interactions. However, controlled parametric experiments show that, provided the Strouhal number is appropriate and the natural interaction between left and right wings can occur, even a simple plunging plate can reproduce the detailed features of the flow seen in dragonflies. In our models, and in dragonflies, it appears that stability of the LEV is achieved by a general mechanism whereby flapping kinematics are configured so that a LEV would be expected to form naturally over the wing and remain attached for the duration of the stroke. However, the actual formation and shedding of the LEV is controlled by wing angle of attack, which dragonflies can vary through both extremes, from zero up to a range that leads to immediate flow separation at any time during a wing stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15531651     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  23 in total

1.  Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.

Authors:  Tuyen Quang Le; Tien Van Truong; Soo Hyung Park; Tri Quang Truong; Jin Hwan Ko; Hoon Cheol Park; Doyoung Byun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Beyond robins: aerodynamic analyses of animal flight.

Authors:  Anders Hedenström; Geoffrey Spedding
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight.

Authors:  Hui Wan; Haibo Dong; Kuo Gai
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

7.  Schlieren photography on freely flying hawkmoth.

Authors:  Yun Liu; Jesse Roll; Stephen Van Kooten; Xinyan Deng
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Time-varying span efficiency through the wingbeat of desert locusts.

Authors:  Per Henningsson; Richard J Bomphrey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Tomographic particle image velocimetry of desert locust wakes: instantaneous volumes combine to reveal hidden vortex elements and rapid wake deformation.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Per Henningsson; Dirk Michaelis; David Hollis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  The typical flight performance of blowflies: measuring the normal performance envelope of Calliphora vicina using a novel corner-cube arena.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Simon M Walker; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.