Hilde Langseth1, Kristina Kjaerheim. 1. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway. hilde.langseth@kreftregisteret.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: A cohort study of female pulp and paper workers in Norway has shown a significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer. Other than the involvement of hormonal and reproductive factors, little is known of the etiology of ovarian cancer. Asbestos and talc are two agents hypothesized to influence the development of the disease. The present study aimed to investigate the association between ovarian cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos, talc, and total dust among Norwegian pulp and paper workers. METHODS: Forty-six cases of ovarian cancer, with four controls each, were included in the study. Occupational exposure was assessed by combining work histories from personnel files, questionnaire information about production processes, and exposure assessments from the mills. To obtain information about possible confounders, cases and controls were invited to participate in a personal interview. RESULTS: The odds ratio for asbestos exposure was 2.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72-5.66. For talc exposure, the odds ratio was 1.10, and for ever exposure to total dust, it was below 1.00. The risk estimates did not essentially differ after adjustment for possible confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not confirm an association between exposure to asbestos, talc, and total dust and ovarian cancer among Norwegian pulp and paper workers. However, the odds ratio for asbestos exposure was doubled, and control for established nonoccupational risk factors did not change the estimate. Therefore, the possibility that exposure to substances in the work environment contributes to the elevated risk cannot be rejected.
OBJECTIVES: A cohort study of female pulp and paper workers in Norway has shown a significantly increased risk of ovarian cancer. Other than the involvement of hormonal and reproductive factors, little is known of the etiology of ovarian cancer. Asbestos and talc are two agents hypothesized to influence the development of the disease. The present study aimed to investigate the association between ovarian cancer and occupational exposure to asbestos, talc, and total dust among Norwegian pulp and paper workers. METHODS: Forty-six cases of ovarian cancer, with four controls each, were included in the study. Occupational exposure was assessed by combining work histories from personnel files, questionnaire information about production processes, and exposure assessments from the mills. To obtain information about possible confounders, cases and controls were invited to participate in a personal interview. RESULTS: The odds ratio for asbestos exposure was 2.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72-5.66. For talc exposure, the odds ratio was 1.10, and for ever exposure to total dust, it was below 1.00. The risk estimates did not essentially differ after adjustment for possible confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results do not confirm an association between exposure to asbestos, talc, and total dust and ovarian cancer among Norwegian pulp and paper workers. However, the odds ratio for asbestos exposure was doubled, and control for established nonoccupational risk factors did not change the estimate. Therefore, the possibility that exposure to substances in the work environment contributes to the elevated risk cannot be rejected.
Authors: Eva Andersson; Håkan Westberg; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Anders Magnuson; Bodil Persson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Elaine Cristina Morari; Andre Bacellar Costa Lima; Natassia Elena Bufalo; Janaina Luisa Leite; Fabiana Granja; Laura Sterian Ward Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Eva Andersson; Bodil Persson; Ing-Liss Bryngelsson; Anders Magnuson; Håkan Westberg Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-07-28 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: M Constanza Camargo; Leslie T Stayner; Kurt Straif; Margarita Reina; Umaima Al-Alem; Paul A Demers; Philip J Landrigan Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-06-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Melisa Bunderson-Schelvan; Jean C Pfau; Robert Crouch; Andrij Holian Journal: J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev Date: 2011 Impact factor: 6.393
Authors: Luigi Vimercati; Domenica Cavone; Maria Celeste Delfino; Biagio Bruni; Luigi De Maria; Antonio Caputi; Stefania Sponselli; Roberta Rossi; Leonardo Resta; Francesco Fortarezza; Federica Pezzuto; Gabriella Serio Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 6.639