Literature DB >> 15529498

Malocclusion and crowding in an orthodontically referred Turkish population.

M Ozgür Sayin1, Hakan Türkkahraman.   

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate malocclusion and crowding in 1356 patients (793 girls, 563 boys) referred to the Department of Orthodontics, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey. Class I was the most frequently seen malocclusion in this referred Turkish orthodontic population whereas Class II, division 2 was the least frequently seen. Comparison of mean ages of the malocclusion groups indicated statistically significant difference between Class I and Class II, division 1 groups (P < .05). The lowest mean age was present in the Class II, division 1 group. Mild mandibular crowding was the most common finding whereas severe mandibular crowding was seen least frequently in all malocclusion groups. Cross tabulation of maxillary and mandibular crowding indicated that mild maxillary and severe mandibular crowding in the same patient was rarely seen in all types of malocclusions. Moderate maxillary and severe mandibular crowding in the same patient was another rare finding for all malocclusion groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15529498     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0635:MACIAO>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  20 in total

1.  Prevalence of Malocclusion among 6 to 10 Year old Nalgonda School Children.

Authors:  E Rajendra Reddy; M Manjula; N Sreelakshmi; S Thabitha Rani; Rajesh Aduri; B Dharamraj Patil
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-12-26

2.  Occlusal characteristics of deaf-mute individuals in the Turkish population.

Authors:  Semra Ciger; Seden Akan
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2010-04

3.  Orthodontic Treatment Provided by General Dentists with Different Types of Appliances in Chattishgarh, India.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Dhanyasi; Yogesh Mahobia; Abhay Prem Prakash Agarwal; Akhil Gupta; Dilshad Quaraishi; Kishwar Zahoor Khan; Anil Agrawal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-06-01

4.  Pretreatment dentoskeletal comparison between individuals treated with extractions in the 1970s and in the new millennium.

Authors:  Rodrigo Naveda; Guilherme Janson; Gabriela Manami Natsumeda; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Leopoldino Capelozza-Filho; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Assessment of Gingival Biotype and Keratinized Gingival Width of Maxillary Anterior Region in Individuals with Different Types of Malocclusion.

Authors:  Özer Alkan; Yeşim Kaya; Eylem A Alkan; Sıddık Keskin; David L Cochran
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Skeletal and Dental Effects of Twin-Block Appliances in Patients Treated With or Without Expansion.

Authors:  Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus; Burak Kale
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-09

7.  Does Appliance Design Affect Treatment Outcomes of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion? A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Burçin Akan; Türkan Sezen Erhamza
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-06-30

8.  Investigation of the maxillary lateral incisor agenesis and associated dental anomalies in an orthodontic patient population.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Hasan Kamak; Hanifi Yildirim; Ismail Ceylan
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-11-01

9.  Relationship between P561T and C422F polymorphisms in growth hormone receptor gene and mandibular prognathism.

Authors:  Sinem Bayram; Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Ercan Kurar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Effects of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy on orthodontic pain by means of the analysis of interleukin 1-beta and substance P levels in the gingival crevicular fluid.

Authors:  Yeşim Kaya; Özer Alkan; Ahmet Ufuk Kömüroglu; Sıddık Keskin
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.