Literature DB >> 15529185

Tumor classification by tissue microarray profiling: random forest clustering applied to renal cell carcinoma.

Tao Shi1, David Seligson, Arie S Belldegrun, Aarno Palotie, Steve Horvath.   

Abstract

We describe a novel strategy (random forest clustering) for tumor profiling based on tissue microarray data. Random forest clustering is attractive for tissue microarray and other immunohistochemistry data since it handles highly skewed tumor marker expressions well and weighs the contribution of each marker according to its relatedness with other tumor markers. This is the first tumor class discovery analysis of renal cell carcinoma patients based on protein expression profiles. The tissue array data contained at least three tumor samples from each of 366 renal cell carcinoma patients. The eight tumor markers explore tumor proliferation, cell cycle abnormalities, cell mobility, and the hypoxia pathway. Since the procedure is unsupervised, no clinicopathological data or traditional classifications are used a priori. To explore whether the tissue microarray data can be used to identify fundamental subtypes of renal cell carcinoma patients, we first carried out random forest clustering of all 366 patients. By analyzing the tumor markers simultaneously, the procedure automatically detected classes that correspond to clear- vs non-clear cell tumors (demonstration of proof-of-principle). The resulting molecular grouping provides better prediction of survival (logrank P=0.000090) than this classical pathological grouping (logrank P=0.023). We then sought to extend the class discovery by searching for finer subclasses of clear cell patients. The procedure automatically discovered: (a) two classes corresponding to low- and high-grade patients (demonstration of proof-of-principle); (b) a subgroup of long-surviving clear cell patients with a distinct molecular profile and (c) two novel tumor subclasses in low-grade clear cell patients that could not be explained by any clinicopathological variables (demonstration of discovery).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15529185     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  41 in total

1.  Advances in cancer tissue microarray technology: Towards improved understanding and diagnostics.

Authors:  Wenjin Chen; David J Foran
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 6.558

2.  Predictors of enrollment in individual- and couple-based lifestyle intervention trials for cancer survivors.

Authors:  Emily Cox-Martin; Jaejoon Song; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth J Lyons; Karen Basen-Engquist
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Immunologic and Metabolic Features of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Define Prognostic Subtypes of Disease.

Authors:  Jack Hutcheson; Uthra Balaji; Matthew R Porembka; Megan B Wachsmann; Peter A McCue; Erik S Knudsen; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Random forests for genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Hemant Ishwaran
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Combined analysis of transcriptome and proteome data as a tool for the identification of candidate biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Barbara Seliger; Sven P Dressler; Ena Wang; Roland Kellner; Christian V Recktenwald; Friedrich Lottspeich; Francesco M Marincola; Maja Baumgärtner; Derek Atkins; Rudolf Lichtenfels
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.984

6.  Altered cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Elton Rexhepaj; Sallyann L O'Brien; Elaine McSherry; Darran P O'Connor; Ailís Fagan; Aedín C Culhane; Desmond G Higgins; Karin Jirstrom; Robert C Millikan; Goran Landberg; Michael J Duffy; Stephen M Hewitt; William M Gallagher
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; James Malley; Gerhard Tutz
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2009-12

8.  EM-random forest and new measures of variable importance for multi-locus quantitative trait linkage analysis.

Authors:  Sophia S F Lee; Lei Sun; Rafal Kustra; Shelley B Bull
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Convergent Random Forest predictor: methodology for predicting drug response from genome-scale data applied to anti-TNF response.

Authors:  Jadwiga R Bienkowska; Gul S Dalgin; Franak Batliwalla; Normand Allaire; Ronenn Roubenoff; Peter K Gregersen; John P Carulli
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 5.736

10.  Aromatase expression predicts survival in women with early-stage non small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vei Mah; David B Seligson; Ai Li; Diana C Márquez; Ignacio I Wistuba; Yahya Elshimali; Michael C Fishbein; David Chia; Richard J Pietras; Lee Goodglick
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.