Literature DB >> 15528583

Supporting clinical practice at the bedside using wireless technology.

Michael J Bullard1, David P Meurer, Ian Colman, Brian R Holroyd, Brian H Rowe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Despite studies that show improvements in both standards of care and outcomes with the judicious application of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), their clinical utilization remains low. This randomized controlled trial examined the use of a wirelessly networked mobile computer (MC) by physicians at the bedside with access to an emergency department information system, decision support tools (DSTs), and other software options.
METHODS: Each of ten volunteer emergency physicians was randomized using a matched-pair design to work five shifts in standard fashion (desktop computer [DC] access) and five shifts with a wirelessly networked MC. Work pattern issues and electronic CPG/DST use were compared using end-of-shift satisfaction questionnaires and review of a CPG/DST database. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine between-shift differences.
RESULTS: A total of 100 eight-hour shifts were evaluated; 99% compliance with postshift questionnaires was achieved. Using a seven-point Likert scale (MC values first), MCs were rated as being as fast (5.04 vs. 4.54; p=0.13) and convenient (5.08 vs. 4.14; p=0.07) as DCs. Overall, physicians rated MCs to be less efficient (3.18 vs. 4.30; p=0.02) but encouraged more frequent use of DSTs (4.10 vs. 3.47; p=0.03) without impacting doctor-patient communication (2.78 vs. 2.96; p=0.51). During the study period, physician use of an intranet Web application (eCPG) was more frequent during shifts assigned to the MC when compared with the DC (eCPG uses/shift, 3.6 vs. 2.0; p=0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: The MC technology permitted physicians to access information at the bedside and increased the use of CPG/DST tools. According to physicians, patients appeared to accept their use of information technology to assist in decision making. Development of improved computer technology may address the major limitation of MC portability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15528583     DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  4 in total

1.  A culturally tailored Internet cancer support group for Asian American breast cancer survivors: A randomized controlled pilot intervention study.

Authors:  Wonshik Chee; Yaelim Lee; Eun-Ok Im; Eunice Chee; Hsiu-Min Tsai; Masakazu Nishigaki; Seon Ae Yeo; Marilyn M Schapira; Jun James Mao
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 6.184

Review 2.  Electronic retrieval of health information by healthcare providers to improve practice and patient care.

Authors:  Jessie L McGowan; Roland Grad; Pierre Pluye; Karin Hannes; Katherine Deane; Michel Labrecque; Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

Review 3.  Information and Communication Technologies for the Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Health Professionals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Gino De Angelis; Barbara Davies; Judy King; Jessica McEwan; Sabrina Cavallo; Laurianne Loew; George A Wells; Lucie Brosseau
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2016-11-30

4.  Implementation and use of computerised clinical decision support (CCDS) in emergency pre-hospital care: a qualitative study of paramedic views and experience using Strong Structuration Theory.

Authors:  Alison Porter; Jeremy Dale; Theresa Foster; Pip Logan; Bridget Wells; Helen Snooks
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.