Literature DB >> 15527955

On the optimality of the genetic code, with the consideration of termination codons.

Hani Goodarzi1, Hamed Ahmadi Nejad, Noorossadat Torabi.   

Abstract

The existence of nonrandom patterns in codon assignments is supported by many statistical and biochemical studies. The canonical genetic code is known to be highly efficient in minimizing the effects of mistranslation errors and point mutations. For example, it is known that when an error induces the conversion of an amino acid to another, the biochemical properties of the resulting amino acid are usually very similar to that of the original. Prior studies include many attempts at quantitative estimation of the fraction of randomly generated codes which, based upon load minimization, score higher than the canonical genetic code. In this study, we took into consideration both the relative frequencies of amino acids and nonsense mistranslations, factors which had been previously ignored. Incorporation of these parameters, resulted in a fitness function (phi) which rendered the canonical genetic code to be highly optimized with respect to load minimization. Considering termination codons, we applied a biosynthetic version of the coevolution theory, however, with low significance. We employed a revised cost for the precursor-product pairs of amino acids and showed that the significance of this approach depends on the cost measure matrix used by the researcher. Thus, we have compared the two prominent matrices, point accepted mutations 74-100 (PAM(74-100)) and mutation matrix in our study.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527955     DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosystems        ISSN: 0303-2647            Impact factor:   1.973


  17 in total

1.  Extreme properties of the genetic code markup.

Authors:  G G Malinetsky; S A Naumenko; A V Podlazov
Journal:  Dokl Biochem Biophys       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.788

2.  A neutral origin for error minimization in the genetic code.

Authors:  Steven E Massey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Searching of code space for an error-minimized genetic code via codon capture leads to failure, or requires at least 20 improving codon reassignments via the ambiguous intermediate mechanism.

Authors:  Steven E Massey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  Pathways of Genetic Code Evolution in Ancient and Modern Organisms.

Authors:  Supratim Sengupta; Paul G Higgs
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  An alternative look at code evolution: using non-canonical codes to evaluate adaptive and historic models for the origin of the genetic code.

Authors:  David W Morgens; Andre R O Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Revisiting the physico-chemical hypothesis of code origin: an analysis based on code-sequence coevolution in a finite population.

Authors:  Ashutosh Vishwa Bandhu; Neha Aggarwal; Supratim Sengupta
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 1.950

7.  A four-column theory for the origin of the genetic code: tracing the evolutionary pathways that gave rise to an optimized code.

Authors:  Paul G Higgs
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 4.540

Review 8.  Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma.

Authors:  Eugene V Koonin; Artem S Novozhilov
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.885

9.  Comparison of translation loads for standard and alternative genetic codes.

Authors:  Stefanie Gabriele Sammet; Ugo Bastolla; Markus Porto
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The scenario on the origin of translation in the RNA world: in principle of replication parsimony.

Authors:  Wentao Ma
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 4.540

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.