Literature DB >> 15527478

Growing up in disadvantage: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.

P Attree1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Childhood disadvantage has lasting negative effects on children's health and well-being. However, the impact of poverty and associated disadvantage on children's lives as children is under-researched. This paper reviews a small, but important, group of qualitative studies that prioritize children's perspectives on growing up in disadvantage, exploring the social resources that they typically draw upon.
METHODS: Systematic review methods were used to locate and appraise qualitative studies that take as their focus children's subjective accounts of living in disadvantage. Data from the studies were then synthesized using meta-ethnographic methods.
RESULTS: Children and young people describe aspects of family relationships, friendships and neighbourhoods that help to mitigate the impact of disadvantage on their well-being. However, their accounts demonstrate that such resources are not always and unambignously experienced as supportive and protective. DISCUSSION: This systematic review highlights the value of social resources available to children living in poor circumstances, but also points up their limitations. Poverty, by its very nature, compromises the worth of these resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527478     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00480.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  8 in total

Review 1.  A critical analysis of UK public health policies in relation to diet and nutrition in low-income households.

Authors:  Pamela Attree
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.

Authors:  Andrew Booth
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

3.  Children's Lived Experiences in Poverty in Hong Kong as a High-Income Asian Society.

Authors:  Esther Yin-Nei Cho; Victor C W Wong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  What makes for a 'good' or 'bad' paediatric diabetes service from the viewpoint of children, young people, carers and clinicians? A synthesis of qualitative findings.

Authors:  Katherine Curtis-Tyler; Lisa Arai; Terence Stephenson; Helen Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Social gradients in child and adolescent antisocial behavior: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Patrycja J Piotrowska; Christopher B Stride; Richard Rowe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-23

6.  Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Lisa M Williamson; Alison Parkes; Daniel Wight; Mark Petticrew; Graham J Hart
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Reaching consensus on reporting patient and public involvement (PPI) in research: methods and lessons learned from the development of reporting guidelines.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Iveta Simera; Kate Seers; Carole Mockford; Susan Goodlad; Doug Altman; David Moher; Rosemary Barber; Simon Denegri; Andrew Robert Entwistle; Peter Littlejohns; Christopher Morris; Rashida Suleman; Victoria Thomas; Colin Tysall
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Malla; Paul Aylward; Paul Ward
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2018-10-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.