Literature DB >> 15527471

Improving services for disadvantaged childbearing women.

L D'Souza1, J Garcia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tackling health inequalities is high on the political agenda of the Labour government. The government wants to reduce inequalities through policies based on evidence, the health of childbearing women and their babies being priority areas for action. National Service Frameworks (NSFs) are being set up to ensure high quality services for all groups. The External Working Group looking into maternity services for the Children's NSF seeks evidence upon which to plan strategies for all women, while focusing attention on the most disadvantaged. Wide differentials are noted between high- and low-income groups in the outcomes of pregnancy and the health of babies. The worst outcomes appear to be concentrated in small subgroups of disadvantaged women. AIM: To report on a review of studies of interventions improving perinatal outcomes for disadvantaged women, to inform policy and practice around the organization and delivery of statutory services in the UK.
METHOD: We searched six relevant databases for reviews, intervention studies, audits and descriptions of services reporting outcomes for disadvantaged groups of women, published between 1990 and 2003. Synthesis was performed around what works and what does not work. Gaps in the evidence base were identified.
RESULTS: We found limited evidence of effective and promising interventions for childbearing women from minority ethnic groups, women experiencing domestic violence, women with mental health illness and HIV infected women. Few studies were well-designed or powered to detect effectiveness. There were no studies of interventions for women prisoners, homeless women and travellers.
CONCLUSIONS: Searching for intervention studies primarily by participant subgroup has brought in evidence from few well-designed studies on which to plan policy. Combining this approach with searching for intervention studies addressing behaviour like smoking, and needs like social support, may provide further evidence to tackle inequalities in the perinatal period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15527471     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00471.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  14 in total

Review 1.  Acknowledging a persistent truth: domestic violence in pregnancy.

Authors:  Joanna Cook; Susan Bewley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors:  Vivian Welch; Peter Tugwell; Mark Petticrew; Joanne de Montigny; Erin Ueffing; Betsy Kristjansson; Jessie McGowan; Maria Benkhalti Jandu; George A Wells; Kevin Brand; Janet Smylie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-12-08

3.  Immigrant women's experiences of maternity-care services in Canada: a protocol for systematic review using a narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Gina M A Higginbottom; Myfanwy Morgan; Jayantha Dassanayake; Helgi Eyford; Mirande Alexandre; Yvonne Chiu; Joan Forgeron; Deb Kocay
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-31

Review 4.  The effectiveness of antenatal care programmes to reduce infant mortality and preterm birth in socially disadvantaged and vulnerable women in high-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Hollowell; Laura Oakley; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Peter Brocklehurst; Ron Gray
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Evaluation of Lay Support in Pregnant women with Social risk (ELSIPS): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara Kenyon; Kate Jolly; Karla Hemming; Lucy Ingram; Nicola Gale; Sophie-Anna Dann; Jacky Chambers; Christine MacArthur
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors:  Vivian Welch; Omar Dewidar; Elizabeth Tanjong Ghogomu; Salman Abdisalam; Abdulah Al Ameer; Victoria I Barbeau; Kevin Brand; Kisanet Kebedom; Maria Benkhalti; Elizabeth Kristjansson; Mohamad Tarek Madani; Alba M Antequera Martín; Christine M Mathew; Jessie McGowan; William McLeod; Hanbyoul Agatha Park; Jennifer Petkovic; Alison Riddle; Peter Tugwell; Mark Petticrew; Jessica Trawin; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-18

Review 7.  Immigrant women's experiences of maternity-care services in Canada: a systematic review using a narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Gina M A Higginbottom; Myfanwy Morgan; Mirande Alexandre; Yvonne Chiu; Joan Forgeron; Deb Kocay; Rubina Barolia
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-11

8.  Reliability of self reported smoking status by pregnant women for estimating smoking prevalence: a retrospective, cross sectional study.

Authors:  Deborah Shipton; David M Tappin; Thenmalar Vadiveloo; Jennifer A Crossley; David A Aitken; Jim Chalmers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-29

9.  Experiencing maternity care: the care received and perceptions of women from different ethnic groups.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Haiyan Gao; Maggie Redshaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Maternal deaths among rural-urban migrants in China: a case-control study.

Authors:  Jingxu Zhang; Xiaozhuang Zhang; Liqian Qiu; Ronglian Zhang; David B Hipgrave; Yan Wang; Pei Zhang; Ruyan Pang; Sufang Guo
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.