Literature DB >> 1552574

Lithostar extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 1,000 patients. Toronto Lithotripsy Associates.

K E Psihramis1, M A Jewett, C Bombardier, D Caron, M Ryan.   

Abstract

To our knowledge this study of our first consecutive 1,000 patients treated with the Siemens Lithostar device is the largest prospective series reported to date. Treatment results were determined at 3, 12 and 24 months after completion of therapy. The results at 3 months are presented. Complete followup data were available on 801 patients: 674 with renal and 127 with ureteral calculi. Results were analyzed according to stone size, location and number. The average number of shocks per treatment was 3,804 and the retreatment rate was 18.6%. At 3 months the stone-free rate was determined by a plain film of the kidneys, ureters and bladder and plain tomograms for renal calculi, and by an excretory urogram for ureteral calculi. The stone-free rate was 52% for renal and 76% for ureteral calculi. The overall stone-free rate for all calculi was 55.7%. Success rate, defined as stone-free or asymptomatic residual fragments measuring 4 mm. or less, was 72% for renal and 83% for ureteral calculi. The overall success rate for all calculi was 73.9%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1552574     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37447-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

2.  Management behaviors of the urology practitioners to the small lower calyceal stones: the results of a web-based survey.

Authors:  Ferhat Ates; Murat Zor; Omer Yılmaz; Murat Tuncer; Metin Ozturk; Cenk Gurbuz; Gokhan Atis; Orhan Koca; Asif Yildirim; Bilal Eryildirim; Eyup Veli Kucuk; Fehmi Narter; Temucin Senkul; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.

Authors:  Takehiko Nakasato; Jun Morita; Yoshio Ogawa
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Simple and practical nomograms for predicting the stone-free rate after shock wave lithotripsy in patients with a solitary upper ureteral stone.

Authors:  Naoya Niwa; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Makoto Miyahara; Minami Omura; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Eiji Kikuchi; Akira Miyajima; Kazutoyo Miyata; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Faruk Ozgor; Abdulmuttalip Simsek; Murat Binbay; Tolga Akman; Onur Kucuktopcu; Omer Sarilar; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Yalcin Berberoglu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Outcome of shock wave lithotripsy as monotherapy for large solitary renal stones (>2 cm in size) without stenting.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Rajaian; Santosh Kumar; Ganesh Gopalakrishnan; Ninan K Chacko; Antony Devasia; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07

7.  Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy - the controversy continues.

Authors:  M Hammad Ather; Fuad Abid; Sobia Akhtar; Karim Khawaja
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 2.264

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.