Literature DB >> 15525697

A bayesian analysis of metazoan mitochondrial genome arrangements.

Bret Larget1, Donald L Simon, Joseph B Kadane, Deborah Sweet.   

Abstract

Genome arrangements are a potentially powerful source of information to infer evolutionary relationships among distantly related taxa. Mitochondrial genome arrangements may be especially informative about metazoan evolutionary relationships because (1) nearly all animals have the same set of definitively homologous mitochondrial genes, (2) mitochondrial genome rearrangement events are rare relative to changes in sequences, and (3) the number of possible mitochondrial genome arrangements is huge, making convergent evolution of genome arrangements appear highly unlikely. In previous studies, phylogenetic evidence in genome arrangement data is nearly always used in a qualitative fashion-the support in favor of clades with similar or identical genome arrangements is considered to be quite strong, but is not quantified. The purpose of this article is to quantify the uncertainty among the relationships of metazoan phyla on the basis of mitochondrial genome arrangements while incorporating prior knowledge of the monophyly of various groups from other sources. The work we present here differs from our previous work in the statistics literature in that (1) we incorporate prior information on classifications of metazoans at the phylum level, (2) we describe several advances in our computational approach, and (3) we analyze a much larger data set (87 taxa) that consists of each unique, complete mitochondrial genome arrangement with a full complement of 37 genes that were present in the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database at a recent date. In addition, we analyze a subset of 28 of these 87 taxa for which the non-tRNA mitochondrial genomes are unique where the assumption of our inversion-only model of rearrangement is more plausible. We present summaries of Bayesian posterior distributions of tree topology on the basis of these two data sets.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15525697     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  19 in total

1.  Distance-based genome rearrangement phylogeny.

Authors:  Li-San Wang; Tandy Warnow; Bernard M E Moret; Robert K Jansen; Linda A Raubeson
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Mitochondrial genome of Trichoplax adhaerens supports placozoa as the basal lower metazoan phylum.

Authors:  Stephen L Dellaporta; Anthony Xu; Sven Sagasser; Wolfgang Jakob; Maria A Moreno; Leo W Buss; Bernd Schierwater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Neisseria meningitidis is structured in clades associated with restriction modification systems that modulate homologous recombination.

Authors:  Sonia Budroni; Emilio Siena; Julie C Dunning Hotopp; Kate L Seib; Davide Serruto; Chiara Nofroni; Maurizio Comanducci; David R Riley; Sean C Daugherty; Samuel V Angiuoli; Antonello Covacci; Mariagrazia Pizza; Rino Rappuoli; E Richard Moxon; Hervé Tettelin; Duccio Medini
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Efficient sampling of parsimonious inversion histories with application to genome rearrangement in Yersinia.

Authors:  István Miklós; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Recovering genome rearrangements in the mammalian phylogeny.

Authors:  Hao Zhao; Guillaume Bourque
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The evolution of genomic instability in the obligate endosymbionts of whiteflies.

Authors:  Daniel B Sloan; Nancy A Moran
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Sampling solution traces for the problem of sorting permutations by signed reversals.

Authors:  Christian Baudet; Zanoni Dias; Marie-France Sagot
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 1.405

8.  Sessile snails, dynamic genomes: gene rearrangements within the mitochondrial genome of a family of caenogastropod molluscs.

Authors:  Timothy A Rawlings; Martin J MacInnis; Rüdiger Bieler; Jeffrey L Boore; Timothy M Collins
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Seevolution: visualizing chromosome evolution.

Authors:  Andrés Esteban-Marcos; Aaron E Darling; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Recurring genomic breaks in independent lineages support genomic fragility.

Authors:  Hanno Hinsch; Sridhar Hannenhalli
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.