Literature DB >> 15525672

Analysis of a spindle pole body mutant reveals a defect in biorientation and illuminates spindle forces.

Tennessee J Yoder1, Mark A McElwain, Susan E Francis, Joy Bagley, Eric G D Muller, Brian Pak, Eileen T O'Toole, Mark Winey, Trisha N Davis.   

Abstract

The spindle pole body (SPB) is the microtubule organizing center in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An essential task of the SPB is to ensure assembly of the bipolar spindle, which requires a proper balancing of forces on the microtubules and chromosomes. The SPB component Spc110p connects the ends of the spindle microtubules to the core of the SPB. We previously reported the isolation of a mutant allele spc110-226 that causes broken spindles and SPB disintegration 30 min after spindle formation. By live cell imaging of mutant cells with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Tub1p or Spc97p-GFP, we show that spc110-226 mutant cells have early defects in spindle assembly. Short spindles form but do not advance to the 1.5-microm stage and frequently collapse. Kinetochores are not arranged properly in the mutant cells. In 70% of the cells, no stable biorientation occurs and all kinetochores are associated with only one SPB. Examination of the SPB remnants by electron microscopy tomography and fluorescence microscopy revealed that the Spc110-226p/calmodulin complex is stripped off of the central plaque of the SPB and coalesces to from a nucleating structure in the nucleoplasm. The central plaque components Spc42p and Spc29p remain behind in the nuclear envelope. The delamination is likely due to a perturbed interaction between Spc42p and Spc110-226p as detected by fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. We suggest that the force exerted on the SPB by biorientation of the chromosomes pulls the Spc110-226p out of the SPB; removal of force exerted by coherence of the sister chromatids reduced fragmentation fourfold. Removal of the forces exerted by the cytoplasmic microtubules had no effect on fragmentation. Our results provide insights into the relative contributions of the kinetochore and cytoplasmic microtubules to the forces involved in formation of a bipolar spindle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15525672      PMCID: PMC539159          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e04-08-0703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  48 in total

1.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body is a dynamic structure.

Authors:  Tennessee J Yoder; Chad G Pearson; Kerry Bloom; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-05-03       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  W S Saunders; M A Hoyt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-08-07       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Duplication of spindle plaques and integration of the yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  B Byers; L Goetsch
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1974

4.  Can calmodulin function without binding calcium?

Authors:  J R Geiser; D van Tuinen; S E Brockerhoff; M M Neff; T N Davis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-06-14       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Thioredoxin deficiency in yeast prolongs S phase and shortens the G1 interval of the cell cycle.

Authors:  E G Muller
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The CDC26 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required for cell growth only at high temperature.

Authors:  H Araki; K Awane; N Ogawa; Y Oshima
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-01

7.  Assigning function to yeast proteins by integration of technologies.

Authors:  Tony R Hazbun; Lars Malmström; Scott Anderson; Beth J Graczyk; Bethany Fox; Michael Riffle; Bryan A Sundin; J Derringer Aranda; W Hayes McDonald; Chun-Hwei Chiu; Brian E Snydsman; Phillip Bradley; Eric G D Muller; Stanley Fields; David Baker; John R Yates; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Two Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin-related gene products required for mitotic spindle assembly.

Authors:  M A Hoyt; L He; K K Loo; W S Saunders
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Kinesin-related proteins required for assembly of the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  D M Roof; P B Meluh; M D Rose
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Direct observation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores in Xenopus extract spindles: implications for spindle mechanics.

Authors:  Paul Maddox; Aaron Straight; Peg Coughlin; Timothy J Mitchison; Edward D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  15 in total

1.  Phosphorylation of the chromosomal passenger protein Bir1 is required for localization of Ndc10 to the spindle during anaphase and full spindle elongation.

Authors:  Per O Widlund; John S Lyssand; Scott Anderson; Sherry Niessen; John R Yates; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  A high-efficiency method to replace essential genes with mutant alleles in yeast.

Authors:  Per O Widlund; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2005-07-30       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 couples kinetochores to microtubule plus ends at metaphase.

Authors:  Michelle M Shimogawa; Beth Graczyk; Melissa K Gardner; Susan E Francis; Erin A White; Michael Ess; Jeffrey N Molk; Cristian Ruse; Sherry Niessen; John R Yates; Eric G D Muller; Kerry Bloom; David J Odde; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Mitotic spindle form and function.

Authors:  Mark Winey; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The organization of the core proteins of the yeast spindle pole body.

Authors:  Eric G D Muller; Brian E Snydsman; Isabella Novik; Dale W Hailey; Daniel R Gestaut; Christine A Niemann; Eileen T O'Toole; Tom H Giddings; Bryan A Sundin; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body remodeling factors.

Authors:  Kristen B Greenland; Huiming Ding; Michael Costanzo; Charles Boone; Trisha N Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Distinct roles for key karyogamy proteins during yeast nuclear fusion.

Authors:  Patricia Melloy; Shu Shen; Erin White; Mark D Rose
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  The SUN protein Mps3 is required for spindle pole body insertion into the nuclear membrane and nuclear envelope homeostasis.

Authors:  Jennifer M Friederichs; Suman Ghosh; Christine J Smoyer; Scott McCroskey; Brandon D Miller; Kyle J Weaver; Kym M Delventhal; Jay Unruh; Brian D Slaughter; Sue L Jaspersen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Nuclear fusion during yeast mating occurs by a three-step pathway.

Authors:  Patricia Melloy; Shu Shen; Erin White; J Richard McIntosh; Mark D Rose
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Fission yeast Pcp1 links polo kinase-mediated mitotic entry to gamma-tubulin-dependent spindle formation.

Authors:  Chii Shyang Fong; Masamitsu Sato; Takashi Toda
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.