Literature DB >> 15525370

Monitoring of antimicrobial resistance among food animals: principles and limitations.

F M Aarestrup1.   

Abstract

Large amounts of antimicrobial agents are in the production of food animals used for therapy and prophylactics of bacterial infections and in feed to promote growth. The use of antimicrobial agents causes problems in the therapy of infections through the selection for resistance among bacteria pathogenic for animals or humans. Current knowledge regarding the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in food animals, the quantitative impact of the use of different antimicrobial agents on selection for resistance and the most appropriate treatment regimes to limit the development of resistance is incomplete. Programmes monitoring the occurrence and development of resistance are essential to determine the most important areas for intervention and to monitor the effects of interventions. When designing a monitoring programme it is important to decide on the purpose of the programme. Thus, there are major differences between programmes designed to detect changes in a national population, individual herds or groups of animals. In addition, programmes have to be designed differently according to whether the aim is to determine changes in resistance for all antimicrobial agents or only the antimicrobial agents considered most important in relation to treatment of humans. In 1995 a continuous surveillance for antimicrobial resistance among bacteria isolated from food animals was established in Denmark. Three categories of bacteria, indicator bacteria, zoonotic bacteria and animal pathogens are continuously isolated from broilers, cattle and pigs and tested for susceptibility to antimicrobial agents used for therapy and growth promotion by disc diffusion or minimal inhibitory concentration determinations. This programme will only detect changes on a national level. However, isolating the bacteria and testing for several antimicrobial agents will enable us to determine the effect of linkage of resistance. Since 1995 major differences in the consumption pattern of different antimicrobial agents have occurred in Denmark. The Danish monitoring programme has enabled us to determine the effect of these changes on the occurrence of resistance. The Danish monitoring is, however, not suited to determine changes on a herd level or to detect emergence of new types of resistance only occurring at a low level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15525370     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2004.00775.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health        ISSN: 0931-1793


  20 in total

1.  Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance and Transfer of Tetracycline Resistance Genes in Escherichia coli Isolates from Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Seung Won Shin; Min Kyoung Shin; Myunghwan Jung; Kuastros Mekonnen Belaynehe; Han Sang Yoo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The importance of sample size in the determination of a flock-level antimicrobial resistance profile for Escherichia coli in broilers.

Authors:  Davy Persoons; Kaatje Bollaerts; Annemieke Smet; Lieve Herman; Marc Heyndrickx; An Martel; Patrick Butaye; Boudewijn Catry; Freddy Haesebrouck; Jeroen Dewulf
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.431

3.  Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Pasteurella multocida and Streptococcus suis from Ontario swine.

Authors:  Shiona K Glass-Kaastra; David L Pearl; Richard J Reid-Smith; Beverly McEwen; Durda Slavic; Jim Fairles; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.310

Review 4.  The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: a personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward.

Authors:  Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Role of antimicrobial selective pressure and secondary factors on antimicrobial resistance prevalence in Escherichia coli from food-producing animals in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuki Harada; Tetsuo Asai
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-02

6.  Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in generic Escherichia coil and Salmonella spp. cultured from identical fecal samples in finishing swine.

Authors:  Csaba Varga; Andrijana Rajić; Margaret E McFall; Richard J Reid-Smith; Anne E Deckert; David L Pearl; Brent P Avery; Sylvia L Checkley; Scott A McEwen
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.310

7.  Quantifying antimicrobial resistance at veal calf farms.

Authors:  Angela B Bosman; Jaap A Wagenaar; Jaap Wagenaar; Arjan Stegeman; Hans Vernooij; Dik Mevius
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of mastitis pathogens isolated from dairy herds transitioning to organic management.

Authors:  Young Kyung Park; Lawrence K Fox; Dale D Hancock; Wade McMahan; Yong Ho Park
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.672

9.  Latent class comparison of test accuracy when evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility using disk diffusion and broth microdilution to test Escherichia coli and Mannheimia haemolytica isolates recovered from beef feedlot cattle.

Authors:  K M Benedict; S P Gow; R J Reid-Smith; C W Booker; T A McAllister; P S Morley
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.434

10.  Genetic mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance identified in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and Enteroccocus spp. isolated from U.S. food animals.

Authors:  Jonathan G Frye; Charlene R Jackson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.