Literature DB >> 1552406

Comparison of sprinkle versus syrup formulations of valproate for bioavailability, tolerance, and preference.

J C Cloyd1, R L Kriel, C M Jones-Saete, B Y Ong, J T Jancik, R P Remmel.   

Abstract

We compared a new coated-particle formulation of valproate (Depakote Sprinkle) capsules with valproic acid (Depakene) syrup for bioavailability, side effects, and patient and parent preference. Twelve children with epilepsy, aged 5 to 16 years, participated in this randomized, two-period, crossover study. They were assigned to a 7-day regimen with one formulation and then crossed over to the other; the drug was given every 12 hours. On day 7, blood samples collected during a 12-hour period were analyzed for the presence of valproate. At the study's end, parents and children were asked structured questions regarding formulation preference and adverse events. The extent of absorption from sprinkle equaled that from syrup (relative bioavailability = 1.02), but absorption was slower (time to maximum concentration = 4.2 vs 0.9 hour; p less than 0.01). Fluctuations in serum concentrations were less with sprinkle (34.8% vs 62.3%; p less than 0.01). Sprinkle was preferred by 9 of the 12 parents because of east of administration, and by nine of the children because of improved palatability. We conclude that sprinkle may be substituted for syrup without changing the daily dose. Furthermore, sprinkle, because of its prolonged absorption, may be given every 12 hours to children receiving monotherapy. Compliance may be enhanced because of the more convenient dosing schedules and the high degree of patient and parent acceptance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1552406     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)82496-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  6 in total

Review 1.  Methodology Used to Assess Acceptability of Oral Pediatric Medicines: A Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Review.

Authors:  Punam Mistry; Hannah Batchelor
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in paediatric patients. Part I: Phenobarbital, primidone, valproic acid, ethosuximide and mesuximide.

Authors:  D Battino; M Estienne; G Avanzini
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Acceptability of different oral formulations in infants and preschool children.

Authors:  Diana A van Riet-Nales; Barbara J de Neef; Alfred F A M Schobben; José A Ferreira; Toine C G Egberts; Catharine M A Rademaker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Patient-centred pharmaceutical design to improve acceptability of medicines: similarities and differences in paediatric and geriatric populations.

Authors:  Fang Liu; Sejal Ranmal; Hannah K Batchelor; Mine Orlu-Gul; Terry B Ernest; Iwan W Thomas; Talia Flanagan; Catherine Tuleu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Comparison of Different Liquid and Semisolid Vehicles Selected for Oral Administration of Pellets and Minitablets with Diazepam: In Vitro Investigation.

Authors:  Hanna Kotlowska; Marta Szymanska; Malgorzata Sznitowska
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.246

6.  Validation and Feasibility of the Medication Acceptability Questionnaire to Investigate Tablet and Liquid Alendronic Acid with Older Hospital Patients.

Authors:  Sion Scott; Allan Clark; Helen May; Debi Bhattacharya
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.