Literature DB >> 15523337

Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of different metal alloys and porcelains in the metal-ceramic complex.

Stefanos G Kourtis1, Aris-Petros Tripodakis, Asterios A Doukoudakis.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Color matching between natural teeth, shade guides, and metal-ceramic restorations is a common clinical problem. Difficulties related to color matching arise from structural differences that exist between metal-ceramic crowns and natural teeth, the limited range of available ceramic shades, inadequate shade guides, different types of metal alloys, and varying compositions of ceramic materials.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of various metal alloys and 2 porcelains on the final color of metal-ceramic complex. Material and methods Four commercial alloys for metal-ceramic restorations, a Ni-Cr (Thermobond), a Co-Cr (Wirobond), a Pd-rich noble (Cerapal-2), and a high noble Au-alloy (V-Delta) were combined with 2 porcelains (Vita Omega and Ceramco Silver) in metal-ceramic specimens with a standardized thickness of layers. Five disc-shaped (10 x 1 mm) specimens were prepared for each alloy/porcelain combination. Only opaque and dentin layers were applied (shade A3). The specimens were analyzed with a spectrophotometer, and data were obtained in the CIE Lab color system. The recorded data were analyzed with a 2-way multiple analysis of variance , a pair-wise comparison of group means (Student's t test), and finally, a categorical regression analysis of variance (CATREG) (alpha=.01).
RESULTS: The types of alloy substrate and overlying porcelain significantly affected the color (P < .01). Au and Co-Cr alloys were found to be brighter (higher L* values) than the Ni-Cr and the Pd alloys ( P <.01, SE 0.239). Ceramco porcelain was found to be most red (higher a* values) of all tested alloys ( P <.01). Gold and Pd alloys caused a yellow shift to the metal-ceramic color compared to the Ni-Cr and the Co-Cr alloys with both porcelains ( P < .01, SE 0.165). The detected color differences were visually perceptible for some alloy-porcelain combinations.
CONCLUSIONS: The final color of metal ceramic specimens was influenced both from the type of alloy substructure and from the type of overlying porcelain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15523337     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  The Effect of Accelerated Aging on the Colour Stability of Composite Resin Luting Cements using Different Bonding Techniques.

Authors:  Satheesh B Haralur; Mohammed Alfaifi; Abdulmajeed Almuaddi; Mazen Al-Yazeedi; Abdulmajeed Al-Ahmari
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-04-01

2.  Spectrophotometric comparison of two porcelain systems, VMK master and VM13 with the VITA 3D-master shade guide (An in vitro study).

Authors:  Assadollah Ahmadzadeh; Sara Mansourinejad; Sanaz Mansourinejad; Ali Rohani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-04-27

3.  Comparison of the Effect of Different Ceramic Alloys and Porcelain Systems upon the Color of Metal-Ceramic Restorations: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  K V Anitha; M Dhanraj; R Haribabu
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-14

4.  Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a Core Material and a Comparison with Gold Standard Core Materials.

Authors:  Bogna Stawarczyk; Philipp Schmid; Malgorzata Roos; Marlis Eichberger; Patrick R Schmidlin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  The Effect of Laboratory Procedures and Repeated-glazing on Color of Metal-ceramic Restoration.

Authors:  Hatice Özdemir; Zeynep Yesil Duymus
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

6.  Effects of metal surface grinding at the porcelain try-in stage of fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Halil İbrahim Kılınç; Bülent Kesim; Hasan Önder Gümüş; Mehmet Dinçel; Selçuk Erkaya
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 1.904

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.