Literature DB >> 15522592

A comparison of microscope slide substrates for use in transfected cell microarrays.

James B Delehanty1, Kara M Shaffer, Baochuan Lin.   

Abstract

Transfected cell microarrays, arrays of mammalian cells expressing defined genes, offer enormous potential for the development of high-throughput cell-based detection technologies to monitor the presence of biological agents or environmental toxicants. The signals generated from these arrays are intimately linked to the efficiency of DNA uptake by the cells located on the micrometer-sized spots. However, quantitative analysis of the transfection efficiency on cellular microarrays has been limited. Further, little regard has been given to the role of the substrate in influencing the transfection efficiency of mammalian cells on transfected microarrays. In this report, we have quantified the transfection efficiency of mammalian cells on different microscope slide substrates. Using commercially available microscope slides bearing substrates that mediate cellular attachment (polystyrene, 3-aminopropylsilane, and poly-L-lysine), we have demonstrated the role of substrate hydrophobicity in determining the resulting spot size and the local DNA concentration when plasmid DNA is dispensed in a printing buffer containing gelatin and sucrose using a noncontact microarray printer. The mean spot diameter varied inversely with the substrate water contact angle (r2 = 0.970). Further, the relative local plasmid DNA concentration was a function of the mean spot diameter. The deposition of Rhodamine Red-labeled plasmid DNA revealed that, across all substrates, the average fluorescence signal within the spots varied inversely with the mean spot diameter (r2 = 0.976). The transfection efficiency of HEK 293T/17 cells varied in accord with the mean spot diameter, demonstrating that the uptake of DNA was a function of the local DNA concentration on each substrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15522592     DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2004.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  7 in total

Review 1.  Blood-on-a-chip.

Authors:  Mehmet Toner; Daniel Irimia
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Site-specific gene transfer with high efficiency onto a carbon nanotube-loaded electrode.

Authors:  Y Inoue; H Fujimoto; T Ogino; H Iwata
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Substrate-mediated delivery from self-assembled monolayers: effect of surface ionization, hydrophilicity, and patterning.

Authors:  Angela K Pannier; Brian C Anderson; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2005-07-25       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Emerging links between surface nanotechnology and endocytosis: impact on nonviral gene delivery.

Authors:  Andrew F Adler; Kam W Leong
Journal:  Nano Today       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 20.722

5.  Bioluminescence imaging for assessment and normalization in transfected cell arrays.

Authors:  Angela K Pannier; Eric A Ariazi; Abigail D Bellis; Zain Bengali; V Craig Jordan; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Surface polyethylene glycol enhances substrate-mediated gene delivery by nonspecifically immobilized complexes.

Authors:  Angela K Pannier; Julie A Wieland; Lonnie D Shea
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 7.  Living Cell Microarrays: An Overview of Concepts.

Authors:  Rebecca Jonczyk; Tracy Kurth; Antonina Lavrentieva; Johanna-Gabriela Walter; Thomas Scheper; Frank Stahl
Journal:  Microarrays (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.