Literature DB >> 15522487

Are rich people or poor people more likely to be ill? Lay perceptions, by social class and neighbourhood, of inequalities in health.

Sally Macintyre1, Laura McKay, Anne Ellaway.   

Abstract

Research in the UK has suggested that people in lower social classes or from poorer neighbourhoods are less likely than their more socially advantaged counterparts to agree that health and life expectancy are worse among more deprived population groups. The small body of previous research has either used qualitative approaches or coded open-ended responses to survey questions about causes of health and illness or of inequalities between areas. We examined lay perceptions by asking a direct question and using a quantitative, multivariate approach. Residents in three age groups (25, 45 and 65 years old) living in two socially contrasting localities in Glasgow, Scotland, were asked who were more likely to have accidents, cancer, heart disease, mental illness, to be fitter, and to live longer: rich people, poor people, or both equally. Across all the health categories, those in lower social classes or from poorer neighbourhoods were equally or less likely than their more socially advantaged counterparts to say the poor had worse health. In a model containing age, sex, class and locality, those in lower social classes and in the poorer locality were significantly less likely to say that richer people live longer (OR: 0.5). We have therefore confirmed earlier observations that those most at risk of ill health may be less likely to acknowledge the social gradient in health. We suggest a need to examine this apparent paradox in other contexts and in more detail, using both quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15522487     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  7 in total

1.  Roundtable on Urban Living Environment Research (RULER).

Authors:  David Vlahov; Siddharth Raj Agarwal; Robert M Buckley; Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa; Carlos F Corvalan; Alex Chika Ezeh; Ruth Finkelstein; Sharon Friel; Trudy Harpham; Maharufa Hossain; Beatriz de Faria Leao; Gora Mboup; Mark R Montgomery; Julie C Netherland; Danielle C Ompad; Amit Prasad; Andrew T Quinn; Alexander Rothman; David E Satterthwaite; Sally Stansfield; Vanessa J Watson
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Developing a conceptual framework of urban health observatories toward integrating research and evidence into urban policy for health and health equity.

Authors:  W T Caiaffa; A A L Friche; M A S Dias; A L Meireles; C F Ignacio; A Prasad; M Kano
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  Social and geographical factors affecting access to treatment of colorectal cancer: a cancer registry study.

Authors:  S Michael Crawford; Violet Sauerzapf; Robin Haynes; David Forman; Andrew P Jones
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Awareness of racial and socioeconomic health disparities in the United States: the national opinion survey on health and health disparities, 2008-2009.

Authors:  Bridget C Booske; Stephanie A Robert; Angela M K Rohan
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  From causes to solutions--insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities.

Authors:  Christine Putland; Fran E Baum; Anna M Ziersch
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Developing and Validating the Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Questionnaire among the Iranian General Population.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Miri; Hakimeh Malaki Moghadam; Hedieh Eftekhari; Azam Yousefi; Ensiyeh Norozi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2020-03-12

7.  "How the other half live": Lay perspectives on health inequalities in an age of austerity.

Authors:  Kayleigh Garthwaite; Clare Bambra
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.634

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.