Literature DB >> 15522453

The comparative method for evaluating fossil calibration dates: a reply to Hedges and Kumar.

Robert R Reisz, Johannes Müller.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15522453     DOI： 10.1016/j.tig.2004.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN： 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  The origin and diversification of eukaryotes: problems with molecular phylogenetics and molecular clock estimation.

Authors:  Andrew J Roger; Laura A Hug
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Best practices for justifying fossil calibrations.

Authors:  James F Parham; Philip C J Donoghue; Christopher J Bell; Tyler D Calway; Jason J Head; Patricia A Holroyd; Jun G Inoue; Randall B Irmis; Walter G Joyce; Daniel T Ksepka; José S L Patané; Nathan D Smith; James E Tarver; Marcel van Tuinen; Ziheng Yang; Kenneth D Angielczyk; Jenny M Greenwood; Christy A Hipsley; Louis Jacobs; Peter J Makovicky; Johannes Müller; Krister T Smith; Jessica M Theodor; Rachel C M Warnock; Michael J Benton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Integration of Bayesian molecular clock methods and fossil-based soft bounds reveals early Cenozoic origin of African lacertid lizards.

Authors:  Christy A Hipsley; Lin Himmelmann; Dirk Metzler; Johannes Müller
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.260
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.