Literature DB >> 15520891

Variability of lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages and stream habitat characteristics across hierarchical landscape classifications.

Heikki Mykrä1, Jani Heino, Timo Muotka.   

Abstract

Streams are naturally hierarchical systems, and their biota are affected by factors effective at regional to local scales. However, there have been only a few attempts to quantify variation in ecological attributes across multiple spatial scales. We examined the variation in several macroinvertebrate metrics and environmental variables at three hierarchical scales (ecoregions, drainage systems, streams) in boreal headwater streams. In nested analyses of variance, significant spatial variability was observed for most of the macroinvertebrate metrics and environmental variables examined. For most metrics, ecoregions explained more variation than did drainage systems. There was, however, much variation attributable to residuals, suggesting high among-stream variation in macroinvertebrate assemblage characteristics. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and multiresponse permutation procedure (MRPP) showed that assemblage composition differed significantly among both drainage systems and ecoregions. The associated R-statistics were, however, very low, indicating wide variation among sites within the defined landscape classifications. Regional delineations explained most of the variation in stream water chemistry, ecoregions being clearly more influential than drainage systems. For physical habitat characteristics, by contrast, the among-stream component was the major source of variation. Distinct differences attributable to stream size were observed for several metrics, especially total number of taxa and abundance of algae-scraping invertebrates. Although ecoregions clearly account for a considerable amount of variation in macroinvertebrate assemblage characteristics, we suggest that a three-tiered classification system (stratification through ecoregion and habitat type, followed by assemblage prediction within these ecologically meaningful units) will be needed for effective bioassessment of boreal running waters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15520891     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0236-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  3 in total

1.  In search of effective scales for stream management: does agroecoregion, watershed, or their intersection best explain the variance in stream macroinvertebrate communities?

Authors:  A L Dovciak; J A Perry
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Role of scale and environmental factors in regulation of community structure.

Authors:  B A Menge; A M Olson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 17.712

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Land use effects on macrobenthic communities in southeastern United States tidal creeks.

Authors:  Travis Washburn; Denise Sanger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Linking stream and landscape trajectories in the southern Appalachians.

Authors:  Edward P Gardiner; Andrew B Sutherland; Rebecca J Bixby; Mark C Scott; Judy L Meyer; Gene S Helfman; E Fred Benfield; Cathy M Pringle; Paul V Bolstad; David N Wear
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Quantifying Variability in Four U.S. Streams Using a Long-Term Dataset: Patterns in Biotic Endpoints.

Authors:  Camille A Flinders; Douglas B McLaughlin; Renee L Ragsdale
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.266

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.